2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.03.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durability of Voretigene Neparvovec for Biallelic RPE65-Mediated Inherited Retinal Disease

Abstract: Purpose: To determine whether functional vision and visual function improvements after voretigene neparvovec (VN; Luxturna [Spark Therapeutics, Inc]) administration in patients with biallelic RPE65 mutation-associated inherited retinal disease are maintained at 3 to 4 years and to review safety outcomes.Design: Open-label, randomized, controlled phase 3 trial.Participants: Thirty-one individuals were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to intervention (n ¼ 21) or control (n ¼ 10). One participant from each group withd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While any of these approaches would be immensely beneficial as a treatment option and would offer a single treatment option regardless of the ABCA4 mutation, it is unknown for how long transgenes express, and show improvements in humans, given that retinal degenerations often progress over a lifetime ( Cideciyan et al, 2013 ; Bainbridge et al, 2015 ; Jacobson et al, 2015 ; Gardiner et al, 2020 ; Suh et al, 2021 ). However, the most recent follow-up results from the Voretigene Neparvovec (Luxturna) Phase III clinical trial indicate continued improvements after 4-years ( Maguire et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While any of these approaches would be immensely beneficial as a treatment option and would offer a single treatment option regardless of the ABCA4 mutation, it is unknown for how long transgenes express, and show improvements in humans, given that retinal degenerations often progress over a lifetime ( Cideciyan et al, 2013 ; Bainbridge et al, 2015 ; Jacobson et al, 2015 ; Gardiner et al, 2020 ; Suh et al, 2021 ). However, the most recent follow-up results from the Voretigene Neparvovec (Luxturna) Phase III clinical trial indicate continued improvements after 4-years ( Maguire et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, recent clinical trials have made it obvious that gene-based therapies still have a host of challenges that must be overcome if IRDs are to become a curable or at least manageable disease. Questions regarding the long-term safety and durability of AAV-based subretinal vector delivery remain, with long term follow up of patients treated with voretigene neparvovec-showing possible safety signals and a suggestion of visual acuity decline after 4 years (Maguire et al, 2021). While the current IRD clinical trial landscape remains dominated by AAV-based approaches requiring subretinal injection, an increasing number of conveniently administered intravitreal therapeutics such as ASOs are being trialed with encouraging early results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 1 year after treatment, the MLMT change score was 1.8 compared to 0.2 in the control group (p 0.0013), with 65% of test subjects and no control subjects able to pass the MLMT at the lowest luminance of 1 lux (Russell et al, 2017). More recently, the three -year outcomes became available and showed a mean MLMT score of 2.4 among the test subjects, with 71% able to pass the MLMT at the lowest luminance, with visual acuity remaining essentially unchanged (Maguire et al, 2021). The most notable complication among the test subjects was a retinal detachment that occurred in a single patient (1 of 21, 4.8%) at around year four, which was probably related to the original surgical intervention and is a known complication of routine vitrectomy.…”
Section: Gene Replacement Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Human gene therapy trials for an inherited retinal disorder reported temporary restoration of some visual function [15][16][17][18], suggesting that of the remaining diseased photoreceptors, a critical number had reached a point of no return [19]. It is unclear if gene therapy impacts constructive remodeling and, if it does, whether this drives some of the restoration of visual function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%