2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11248-021-00246-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two efficient CRISPR/Cas9 systems for gene editing in soybean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In soybean multiplex gene editing, previous work reported the application of four sgRNAs with two different soybean Pol III-dependent promoters ( GmU3 and GmU6 ) driving the expression of the individual sgRNAs, and this system was used to knock out flavanone-3-hydroxylase (F3H) and flavone synthase II (FNS II) gene to increase the isoflavone content ( Zhang et al., 2020 ). The TCTU and STU systems with three targets were evaluated in soybean hairy roots ( Carrijo et al., 2021 ). They found that the TCTU was more efficient than the STU system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In soybean multiplex gene editing, previous work reported the application of four sgRNAs with two different soybean Pol III-dependent promoters ( GmU3 and GmU6 ) driving the expression of the individual sgRNAs, and this system was used to knock out flavanone-3-hydroxylase (F3H) and flavone synthase II (FNS II) gene to increase the isoflavone content ( Zhang et al., 2020 ). The TCTU and STU systems with three targets were evaluated in soybean hairy roots ( Carrijo et al., 2021 ). They found that the TCTU was more efficient than the STU system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An individual expression unit in the whole cassette is separated by Csy4 hairpins or tRNA Gly genes, generating functional individual units after processing ( Xie et al., 2015 ; Čermák et al., 2017 ). In soybean, the TCTU system was used to increase isoflavone content ( Zhang et al., 2020 ), and STU was used in soybean gene editing ( Carrijo et al., 2021 ). However, the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex gene editing system for soybean still needs to be evaluated and modified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two transcription systems were also tested in soybean including the single transcriptional unit (STU), SpCas9 and sgRNA are driven by only one promoter, and in the conventional system, the two-component transcriptional unit (TCTU), SpCas9, is under the control of a pol II promoter, and sgRNAs are under the control of a pol III promoter. The results showed that the STU is more efficient (Carrijo et al, 2021). Cpf1 (Cas12a) systems have also been established in soybean for GE (Duan et al, 2021;Kim and Choi, 2021).…”
Section: Development Of Transformation Methods For New Breeding Techn...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conduct gene editing research, an efficient transformation system is essential; however, no transformation system suitable for pyrethrum has yet been developed. Agrobacterium rhizogenes -mediated hairy root transformation is considered a rapid, simple, and highly efficient method that enables rapid characterization of improved CRISPR/Cas9 systems in hairy roots [ 26 29 ]. This report describes an A. rhizogenes -mediated hairy root transformation system that can quickly verify the effect of gene editing in pyrethrum, and tests the gene editing effect of a ribozyme-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 system using a pol II promoter in this context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%