Abstract:Purpose
Previous studies indicate that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal assay for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has a consistently high (>95%) negative predictive value (NPV) in ruling out MRSA pneumonia; however, optimal timing of PCR assay specimen and respiratory culture collection is unclear.
Methods
A study including 736 patients from a community hospital system was conducted. Patient… Show more
“…A recent study reported an NPV of 95.5% when the time between MRSA nares and respiratory sample collection was 14 days. 6 We found that history of MRSA infection and time of ≥7 days between swab and respiratory culture were associated with discordance. However, the low event rate limits the ability to control for other confounders and interpretation of findings should be approached carefully based on the nature of the retrospective design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“… 3–6 However, concerns for swab and respiratory culture discordance remain, and there are a few known risk factors associated with discordant results. 4 , 6 We conducted a single-centre, retrospective, case–control study to evaluate predictors of having a discordant result (negative MRSA nares swab with a positive MRSA respiratory culture) in patients diagnosed with pneumonia. Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U -test was used for continuous variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these duration cut-off points have been identified in the literature, the NPV remains high even beyond 7 and 14 days. 6 , 8 Mallidi et al 8 calculated an NPV >98% in critically ill patients using a duration between swab and respiratory sample collection of up to 60 days. Ultimately, extrapolation to other institutions is dependent on local prevalence and testing practices.…”
“…A recent study reported an NPV of 95.5% when the time between MRSA nares and respiratory sample collection was 14 days. 6 We found that history of MRSA infection and time of ≥7 days between swab and respiratory culture were associated with discordance. However, the low event rate limits the ability to control for other confounders and interpretation of findings should be approached carefully based on the nature of the retrospective design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“… 3–6 However, concerns for swab and respiratory culture discordance remain, and there are a few known risk factors associated with discordant results. 4 , 6 We conducted a single-centre, retrospective, case–control study to evaluate predictors of having a discordant result (negative MRSA nares swab with a positive MRSA respiratory culture) in patients diagnosed with pneumonia. Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U -test was used for continuous variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these duration cut-off points have been identified in the literature, the NPV remains high even beyond 7 and 14 days. 6 , 8 Mallidi et al 8 calculated an NPV >98% in critically ill patients using a duration between swab and respiratory sample collection of up to 60 days. Ultimately, extrapolation to other institutions is dependent on local prevalence and testing practices.…”
“…Patients were excluded if confirmatory cultures were not obtained within 2 weeks from the MRSA NaPCR test. 16 Qualifying culture sites included respiratory (bronchoalveolar lavage, sputum, and tracheal aspirate), blood (venous puncture or lines), urine, skin and skin structure (including wound), and intra-abdominal. Augusta University (AU) Medical Center is a 483-bed urban, tertiary referral, academic medical center.…”
Background: Recent literature demonstrates support for using methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swab polymerase chain reaction (NaPCR) screening as an antimicrobial stewardship tool aiding early de-escalation of anti-MRSA antimicrobials. However, immunocompromised patients have been underrepresented in previous studies despite increased risk of morbidity and mortality from multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of the MRSA NaPCR in hospitalized, immunocompromised adult patients with suspected pneumonia. Methods: A single-center, retrospective, observational review was conducted of hospitalized, immunocompromised adult patients that had an MRSA NaPCR obtained between March 1, 2020 and January 10, 2021. For inclusion, bacterial cultures must have been collected within 2 weeks after MRSA NaPCR. The primary outcome was the NPV of MRSA NaPCR in hospitalized, immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia. Secondary outcomes include NPV in other infections. Results: Between March 1, 2020 and January 10, 2021, 59 patients with 78 unique cultures, including 28 respiratory cultures, were included in the study. The NPV of the MRSA NaPCR for pneumonia was 91.7%. The NPV for bloodstream infections was 100% and for urinary tract infections was 100%, but interpretation of these results should be cautioned due to the small sample sizes. Conclusion: The NPV of MRSA NaPCR in pneumonia remains high in this study. The MRSA NaPCR has utility as a de-escalation tool in hospitalized, immunocompromised adult patients, but larger studies are warranted to evaluate all immunocompromised patient populations.
“…The Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has underscored the importance of advancing diagnostic stewardship to enhance treatment, outcomes, and patient safety. 1,2 A recent study conducted by Turner et al 3 assessed the extent to which the nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) maintained its negative predictive value (NPV) in ruling out MRSA-positive respiratory cultures relative to the duration of hospitalization. The study highlighted a high NPV of 95.7% from 49 hours to 7 days and 92.9% from 8 to 14 days.…”
Our health system implemented a novel clinical decision-support system to reduce unnecessary duplicate nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) orders. In an 8-month period, the rate of duplicate MRSA PCR orders within 7 days declined from 4.7% (370 of 7,861) to 1.2% (120 of 9,833).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.