Identifying the barriers to universal cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention at a tertiary hospital in Thailand (patient’s perspectives): implementation research

Chawanpaiboon, Saifon; Titapant, Vitaya; Anuwutnavin, Sanitra; Kanjanapongporn, Attapol; Pooliam, Julaporn

doi:10.1007/s00404-021-06045-3

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Women with a short cervix without history of previous preterm births benefit from treatment with vaginal progesterone by reducing the incidence of preterm delivery <35 weeks of gestation and of neonatal complications [5‒8]. However, aspects challenging universal TV-CL screening include increased costs, prolonged scanning time, patient’s discomfort, and a low positive predictive value [9‒11]. An alternative approach is screening based on risk factors, considering not only obstetric history, but maternal characteristics such as ethnicity, tobacco use, and maternal weight [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing a Universal Cervical Length Screening Program in a Large Hospital System: It Takes Some Time to Achieve Consistent Results

Soto

Hernández‐Andrade

Huntley

et al. 2022

Gynecol Obstet Invest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To describe changes in the acceptance of transvaginal (TV) cervical length (CL) measurements, and in the variance of CL measurements among operators, after implementation of universal TV-CL measurements at 18+0-23+6 weeks/days of gestation. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods This study was performed after universal TV-CL screening was implemented at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston, Texas, for all women undergoing an anatomy ultrasound (US) between 18 0/6 and 23 6/7 weeks of gestation. Pregnant women carrying singletons without prior history of preterm delivery who underwent anatomy ultrasound evaluation between September 2017 and March 2020 (30 months) were included. The complete study period was divided in five epochs of six months each. Changes in patient’s acceptance for the TV scan, in CL distribution, in the prevalence of short cervix defined as ≤15, ≤20, or ≤25 mm, and in the performance of ultrasound operators across the five epochs were evaluated. For this analysis, success rate was defined as the percentage of TV-CL measurements obtained in relation to the number of second trimester anatomy scans. Results: A total of 22,207 low risk pregnant women evaluated by 36 trained sonographers were analyzed. Overall, the acceptance for TV-CL measurement was 82.3% (18,289/22,207), increasing from 76.7% in the first epoch to 82.8% (p<0.0001) in the last epoch. The mean CL did not significantly change from 38.6 mm in the first epoch to 38.5 mm in the last epoch (p=0.7); however, the standard deviation decreased from 7.9 mm in the first epoch to 7.04 mm in the last epoch (p=<0.01). The prevalence of a short cervix ≤25 mm was 2.2% (n=399/18,289), ≤20 mm was 1.2% (224/18,289), and ≤15 mm was 0.9% (162/18,289). This prevalence varied only for CL ≤25 mm from 3.02% (88/2,907) in the first epoch to 1.77% (64/3,615) in the last epoch (p=0.0009). There was a variation in CL measurements among operators (mean 3.3 mm). Sonographers with less than one year of experience had a lower success rate for completing TV-CL examinations than more experienced sonographers (80.8% vs. 85.8%; p <0.03). In general 77% (27/35) of operators had a success rate ≥80% for completing TV-SL scans. Limitations: Characteristics of individuals who accepted versus those who declined TV-CL were not compared; CL values were not correlated with clinical outcomes. Conclusions: During the first six months after implementation of a universal cervical length screening program, there was greater variation in CL measurements, lower acceptance for a TV ultrasound, and a higher number of women diagnosed with a CL ≤25 mm, as compared to subsequent epochs. After the first six months, these metrics improved and remained stable. Most operators improved their performance over time; however, there were a few with a low success rate for TV-CL, and others who systematically over or under estimate CL measurements.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%