Antibiotic use for inpatient newborn care with suspected infection: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study

Abstract

Background An estimated 30 million neonates require inpatient care annually, many with life-threatening infections. Appropriate antibiotic management is crucial, yet there is no routine measurement of coverage. The Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study aimed to validate maternal and newborn indicators to inform measurement of coverage and quality of care. This paper reports validation of reported antibiotic coverage by exit survey of mothers for hospitalized newborns with clinically-defined infections, including sepsis, meningitis, and pneumonia. Methods EN-BIRTH study was conducted in five hospitals in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Tanzania (July 2017–July 2018). Neonates were included based on case definitions to focus on term/near-term, clinically-defined infection syndromes (sepsis, meningitis, and pneumonia), excluding major congenital abnormalities. Clinical management was abstracted from hospital inpatient case notes (verification) which was considered as the gold standard against which to validate accuracy of women’s report. Exit surveys were conducted using questions similar to The Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) approach for coverage of childhood pneumonia treatment. We compared survey-report to case note verified, pooled across the five sites using random effects meta-analysis. Results A total of 1015 inpatient neonates admitted in the five hospitals met inclusion criteria with clinically-defined infection syndromes. According to case note verification, 96.7% received an injectable antibiotic, although only 14.5% of them received the recommended course of at least 7 days. Among women surveyed (n = 910), 98.8% (95% CI: 97.8–99.5%) correctly reported their baby was admitted to a neonatal ward. Only 47.1% (30.1–64.5%) reported their baby’s diagnosis in terms of sepsis, meningitis, or pneumonia. Around three-quarters of women reported their baby received an injection whilst in hospital, but 12.3% reported the correct antibiotic name. Only 10.6% of the babies had a blood culture and less than 1% had a lumbar puncture. Conclusions Women’s report during exit survey consistently underestimated the denominator (reporting the baby had an infection), and even more so the numerator (reporting known injectable antibiotics). Admission to the neonatal ward was accurately reported and may have potential as a contact point indicator for use in household surveys, similar to institutional births. Strengthening capacity and use of laboratory diagnostics including blood culture are essential to promote appropriate use of antibiotics. To track quality of neonatal infection management, we recommend using inpatient records to measure specifics, requiring more research on standardised inpatient records.

Quality of routine health facility data used for newborn indicators in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

“…KMC – Kangaroo Mother Care. Figure shows results from 17 studies, six from case notes [ 28 , 57 , 60 , 62 , 65 , 66 ] and eleven from registers [ 39 , 40 , 42 - 46 , 52 , 55 , 58 , 61 ].…”

Success and time implications of SpO2 measurement through pulse oximetry among hospitalised children in rural Bangladesh: Variability by various device-, provider- and patient-related factors

“…Therefore, the provision for presenting disaggregated estimates and adjusting for various comorbid conditions, such as specific diagnosis and spectrum of pathologies, while exploring the factors affecting the performance of pulse oximetry use was somewhat limited. Moreover, there can be issues with the validity of this information since documentation of paediatric inpatient care has always been a challenge in LMICs like Bangladesh [ 49 ]. Regarding analysis, performance time was non-normally distributed in our analysis (Figure S1 in the Online Supplementary Document ).…”

Child mortality in Bangladesh – why, when, where and how? A national survey-based analysis

“…It indicates that these cases were more complicated and required more specialised and advanced care at referral hospitals [ 29 ]. There are substantial gaps in the quality of inpatient care, including diagnostics, antibiotics and supportive care, in primary and secondary level referral hospitals in Bangladesh [ 60 , 61 ]. Unfortunately, the current national newborn and child health programme does not have any specific activity for strengthening and monitoring the provision and quality of inpatient care in referral facilities.…”