2021
DOI: 10.1177/1049732321998643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Communities Willing to Transition Into Learning Health Care Communities? A Community-Based Participatory Evaluation of Stakeholders’ Receptivity

Abstract: This article aims to determine receptivity for advancing the Learning Healthcare System (LHS) model to a novel evidence-based health care delivery framework—Learning Health Care Community (LHCC)—in Baltimore, as a model for a national initiative. Using community-based participatory, qualitative approach, we conducted 16 in-depth interviews and 15 focus groups with 94 participants. Two independent coders thematically analyzed the transcripts. Participants included community members (38%), health care profession… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A two‐step coding process was followed to analyse the data in concordance with similar qualitative approaches. 23 , 25 , 26 The first step was inductive, where two coders independently read each transcript to identify emerging themes, followed by a group meeting to discuss extracted themes, identify broad categories and refine them into headings that matched the original concepts outlined in the interview guides. 27 , 28 Under each category, major themes and sub‐themes were identified and presented in a codebook that was used for the second step.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A two‐step coding process was followed to analyse the data in concordance with similar qualitative approaches. 23 , 25 , 26 The first step was inductive, where two coders independently read each transcript to identify emerging themes, followed by a group meeting to discuss extracted themes, identify broad categories and refine them into headings that matched the original concepts outlined in the interview guides. 27 , 28 Under each category, major themes and sub‐themes were identified and presented in a codebook that was used for the second step.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LHS model works by ‘systematically capturing and translating information generated by clinical research and health care delivery’ to close open‐ended learning loops 21 . The LHCC model builds on the LHS framework by bringing the LHS's core components into the community by continuously engaging residents, patients, providers and other community stakeholders in the learning process 22,23 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The systematic gathering and generating of data to drive change and improve care within Learning Health Systems (LHS) still face barriers to implementation to ensure continuous patient‐centered, evidence‐based care, particularly in low‐resource settings 1,2 . Although the LHS model advocates for patient‐centered care, there is limited evidence of health systems effectively and genuinely involving patients and community partners in the “learning” process 3 . To meaningfully advance the health and quality of care for patients, address health disparities, and truly provide “patient‐centered” care experiences, patients must be engaged in the research and innovation process as much as in the care delivery process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 , 2 Although the LHS model advocates for patient‐centered care, there is limited evidence of health systems effectively and genuinely involving patients and community partners in the “learning” process. 3 To meaningfully advance the health and quality of care for patients, address health disparities, and truly provide “patient‐centered” care experiences, patients must be engaged in the research and innovation process as much as in the care delivery process. Patient engagement increases the research's relevance to patient needs, improves the quality of a project, and impacts healthcare policy and practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%