Abstract:Background: Genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer has implications for breast cancer decision-making. We examined genetic testing rates, factors associated with testing, and the relationship between genetic testing and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM).Methods: Patients with breast cancer (2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015) from The Health of Women Study were identified and categorized as low, moderate, or high-likelihood of the gene… Show more
“…In particular, despite there being no evidence to suggest that Black women with breast cancer have lower rates of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants than White women, 3 studies from several states have found that Black women with breast cancer have lower rates of indicated testing than White women. [4][5][6] These inequities are particularly concerning given that Black women are more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer before age 40 than White women and have higher breast cancer mortality rates. 7,8 The contribution of insurance coverage and access to racial/ethnic disparities in BRCA testing is not well understood.…”
Background
Testing for
BRCA1/2
pathogenic variants is recommended for women aged ≤45 years with breast cancer. Some studies have found racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in testing. We linked Massachusetts' All‐Payer Claims Database with Massachusetts Cancer Registry data to assess factors associated with
BRCA1/2
testing among young women with breast cancer in Massachusetts, a state with high levels of access to care and equitable insurance coverage of breast cancer gene (
BRCA)
testing.
Methods
We identified breast cancer diagnoses in the Massachusetts Cancer Registry from 2010 to 2013 and linked registry data with Massachusetts All‐Payer Claims Data from 2010 to 2014 among women aged ≤45 years with private insurance or Medicaid. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine factors associated with
BRCA1/2
testing within 6 months of diagnosis.
Results
The study population included 2424 women; 80.3% were identified as non‐Hispanic White, 6.4% non‐Hispanic Black, and 6.3% Hispanic. Overall, 54.9% received
BRCA1/2
testing within 6 months of breast cancer diagnosis. In adjusted analyses, non‐Hispanic Black women had less than half the odds of testing compared with non‐Hispanic White women (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.64). Medicaid‐insured women had half the odds of testing compared with privately‐insured women (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.41, 0.63). Living in lower‐income areas was also associated with lower odds of testing. Having an academically‐affiliated oncology clinician was not associated with testing.
Conclusion
Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities exist in
BRCA1/2
testing among women with breast cancer in Massachusetts, despite equitable insurance coverage of testing. Further research should examine whether disparities have persisted with growing testing awareness and availability over time.
“…In particular, despite there being no evidence to suggest that Black women with breast cancer have lower rates of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants than White women, 3 studies from several states have found that Black women with breast cancer have lower rates of indicated testing than White women. [4][5][6] These inequities are particularly concerning given that Black women are more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer before age 40 than White women and have higher breast cancer mortality rates. 7,8 The contribution of insurance coverage and access to racial/ethnic disparities in BRCA testing is not well understood.…”
Background
Testing for
BRCA1/2
pathogenic variants is recommended for women aged ≤45 years with breast cancer. Some studies have found racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in testing. We linked Massachusetts' All‐Payer Claims Database with Massachusetts Cancer Registry data to assess factors associated with
BRCA1/2
testing among young women with breast cancer in Massachusetts, a state with high levels of access to care and equitable insurance coverage of breast cancer gene (
BRCA)
testing.
Methods
We identified breast cancer diagnoses in the Massachusetts Cancer Registry from 2010 to 2013 and linked registry data with Massachusetts All‐Payer Claims Data from 2010 to 2014 among women aged ≤45 years with private insurance or Medicaid. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine factors associated with
BRCA1/2
testing within 6 months of diagnosis.
Results
The study population included 2424 women; 80.3% were identified as non‐Hispanic White, 6.4% non‐Hispanic Black, and 6.3% Hispanic. Overall, 54.9% received
BRCA1/2
testing within 6 months of breast cancer diagnosis. In adjusted analyses, non‐Hispanic Black women had less than half the odds of testing compared with non‐Hispanic White women (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.64). Medicaid‐insured women had half the odds of testing compared with privately‐insured women (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.41, 0.63). Living in lower‐income areas was also associated with lower odds of testing. Having an academically‐affiliated oncology clinician was not associated with testing.
Conclusion
Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities exist in
BRCA1/2
testing among women with breast cancer in Massachusetts, despite equitable insurance coverage of testing. Further research should examine whether disparities have persisted with growing testing awareness and availability over time.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.