2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03710-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long head biceps tendon instability: diagnostic performance of known and new MRI diagnostic signs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the diagnostic value of various MRI signs for BP lesions, the LHB displacement sign showed the highest accuracy in our study, which was consistent with previous studies (74.4%–87.2%) 14,20 . In contrast, Kang et al 21 reported an accuracy of 65.6%–66.7% for the LHB displacement sign.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the diagnostic value of various MRI signs for BP lesions, the LHB displacement sign showed the highest accuracy in our study, which was consistent with previous studies (74.4%–87.2%) 14,20 . In contrast, Kang et al 21 reported an accuracy of 65.6%–66.7% for the LHB displacement sign.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Multiple studies 13,14,17,20,24,25 have reported that the biceps tendon may remain within the bicipital groove, particularly in minor forms of BP lesions, which may explain the low sensitivity observed in our study and in these previous studies. However, high specificity was observed in our results, as well as in previous studies 14,20,26 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…New and existing diagnostic signs have allowed for enhanced investigation of the PLHB tendon and its surrounding structures, making MRI an effective tool in investigating these structural relationships. 20 , 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the use of novel US technique could help in this difficult diagnostic process, such as echo intensity [ 24 ]. When clinical and ultrasonography evaluation are discordant, or for muscles not accessible to US examination, in elite athletes, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may be required to confirm or exclude minor structural injuries, since this technique is often used as a second-line investigation in musculoskeletal diseases [ 25 , 26 ]. MRI plays only a marginal role in the follow-up and monitoring of structural injuries because the images do not correlate well enough with the clinical evaluation, causing a potential late return to play (RTP) for the athlete.…”
Section: Muscle Injuries Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time small tears may fill with echogenic material, likely representing scar tissue visible at US [ 84 , 85 ]. More extensive scarring results in increased likelihood of recurrent injury [ 25 ].…”
Section: Muscle Injuries Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%