2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02539-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age estimation based on the acetabulum using global illumination rendering with computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, despite that this new technology has been recently applied, at least partially, to some of the acetabular-based estimation methodologies [ 62 – 64 ], some relevant microanatomical details such as different types of porosity, diverse textures, or color shades could not be displayed through CTs so far. Thus, the impossibility to examine the more subtle bony alterations at the 3D images of the auricular surface has already been reported [ 132 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, despite that this new technology has been recently applied, at least partially, to some of the acetabular-based estimation methodologies [ 62 – 64 ], some relevant microanatomical details such as different types of porosity, diverse textures, or color shades could not be displayed through CTs so far. Thus, the impossibility to examine the more subtle bony alterations at the 3D images of the auricular surface has already been reported [ 132 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary constraint of this method for forensic applications is in the identification of an appropriate reference population. However, another work conducted by Belghith et al [ 13 ] used postmortem CT images of the acetabulum and employed global illumination rendering (GIR) with computed tomography to determine age. The inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility for the three variables, as measured by intraclass correlation (ICC), showed a strong level of agreement (ICC ranging from 75.6% to 90.8% and 89.3% to 95.8%, respectively).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%