2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2021.111407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferric iron reductases and their contribution to unicellular ferrous iron uptake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the bacterial cytoplasm, ferrisiderophore reduction involves the superfamily of siderophore-interacting proteins (SIP) composed of two distinct families: FSR family and SIP family ( Cain and Smith, 2021 ). The best understood FSR is E. coli FhuF, which uses a [2Fe-2S] cluster and catalyzes reduction of iron in the ferrisiderophore (desferrichrome and ferrioxamine) ( Matzanke et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Siderophore Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the bacterial cytoplasm, ferrisiderophore reduction involves the superfamily of siderophore-interacting proteins (SIP) composed of two distinct families: FSR family and SIP family ( Cain and Smith, 2021 ). The best understood FSR is E. coli FhuF, which uses a [2Fe-2S] cluster and catalyzes reduction of iron in the ferrisiderophore (desferrichrome and ferrioxamine) ( Matzanke et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Siderophore Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These molecules have a high affinity for Fe 3+ (K aff ≥ 10 30 M -1 ) and allow bacteria to compete against host Fe 3+ -binding proteins for ferric iron (8,10,11). Once acquired and delivered into the cytoplasm, Fe 3+ can be released by degrading the siderophore or through reducing Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ , which is accomplished by ferric iron reductases (8,(10)(11)(12). It is also well known that bacteria employ dedicated transport systems to acquire heme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then compared our homology models of Bf NFeoAB to structurally characterized Feo proteins to determine the locations of each domain of Bf NFeoAB. As our newly determined FeoA structure was not part of the homology modeling, we first superposed the FeoA portion of our Robetta model ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These molecules have a high affinity for Fe 3+ (K aff ≥ 10 30 M −1 ) and allow bacteria to compete against host Fe 3+ -binding proteins for ferric iron ( 8 , 10 , 11 ). Once acquired and delivered into the cytoplasm, Fe 3+ can be released by degrading the siderophore or through reducing Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ , which is accomplished by ferric iron reductases ( 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 ). It is also well known that bacteria use dedicated transport systems to acquire heme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%