2021
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited Evidence for Sensory Prediction Error Responses in Visual Cortex of Macaques and Humans

Abstract: A recent formulation of predictive coding theory proposes that a subset of neurons in each cortical area encodes sensory prediction errors, the difference between predictions relayed from higher cortex and the sensory input. Here, we test for evidence of prediction error responses in spiking responses and local field potentials (LFP) recorded in primary visual cortex and area V4 of macaque monkeys, and in complementary electroencephalographic (EEG) scalp recordings in human participants. We presented a fixed s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
7
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations are consistent with findings from human EEG that demonstrate a prominent role of sound intensity level transition in modulating ERP component amplitudes during the time-window of MMN and P3a (Barry et al, 2022;O'Reilly, 2021a). This adds to evidence suggesting that neural responses to oddball stimulation depend on interactions between physiological adaptation and the physical properties of stimuli, which confound any potential role of prediction-error signalling (Fishman and Steinschneider, 2012;Lazar and Metherate, 2003;May, 2021;May and Tiitinen, 2010;O'Reilly, 2021b;O'Reilly and Conway, 2021;Solomon et al, 2021;.…”
Section: Tone Frequency Changes and Rising Sound-level Transitions Tr...supporting
confidence: 89%
“…These observations are consistent with findings from human EEG that demonstrate a prominent role of sound intensity level transition in modulating ERP component amplitudes during the time-window of MMN and P3a (Barry et al, 2022;O'Reilly, 2021a). This adds to evidence suggesting that neural responses to oddball stimulation depend on interactions between physiological adaptation and the physical properties of stimuli, which confound any potential role of prediction-error signalling (Fishman and Steinschneider, 2012;Lazar and Metherate, 2003;May, 2021;May and Tiitinen, 2010;O'Reilly, 2021b;O'Reilly and Conway, 2021;Solomon et al, 2021;.…”
Section: Tone Frequency Changes and Rising Sound-level Transitions Tr...supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, the temporal context in which the gratings were displayed was irrelevant. The authors therefore concluded “spatial and temporal codes in area V1 operate largely independently.” A more recent study by Solomon et al looked at neural responses in awake macaque and human visual cortex in response to rapidly flashed sequences of sinusoidal gratings ( Solomon et al, 2021 ). They showed standard sequences on 80% of trials and deviant sequences on 20%, expecting to observe prediction errors in response to deviant stimuli.…”
Section: Criticismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theories of predictive coding in the neocortex have typically focused on the idea that feedback from higher cortical areas encodes a prediction about lower-level sensory data ( 29 ) that is subtracted from the lower-level representation, so that the signals traveling up the cortical hierarchy represent surprise or novelty ( 30 , 31 ). However, a recent study failed to find these signatures of predictive coding ( 32 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%