2021
DOI: 10.3390/nu13020631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healthy Lifestyle Management of Pediatric Obesity with a Hybrid System of Customized Mobile Technology: The PediaFit Pilot Project

Abstract: Pediatric obesity management strategies suffer from a high rate of dropout and persistence of weight excess, despite the use of new tools, such as automated mobile technology (MT). We aimed to compare the efficacy of two 6-month personalized MT protocols in terms of better engagement, adherence to follow-up visits and improved anthropometric and lifestyle parameters. MT contacts consisted of three personalized/not automated What’s App® self-monitoring or challenge messages per week. Messages, sent by a dedicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to rapidly growing evidence of their effectiveness and efficiency, technology-based behavioural health interventions are gaining traction as therapeutic resources, both as stand-alone technology or as multi component interventions [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Reflecting on this trend, there are reviews on the efficacy of stand-alone technology apps intervention or multicomponent intervention on healthy lifestyles [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], but still, the developing literature base on technology-based intervention has primarily focused on disease prevention [29,38,42,43], weight management [15,16,18,44,45] or lifestyle improvement outcomes [17,19,44,46], and in many ways has not yet explicated the important implications for a stand-alone technology intervention on healthy food purchases and healthy food consumption outcomes. Along with the relative lack of attention, specifically on healthy food purchasing and consumption, this review paper poses the following important research questions: Are technology app-based interventions effective enough to support healthy food purchase and consumption when compared with the traditional interventions such as face-to-face counselling, literature and group-based education?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to rapidly growing evidence of their effectiveness and efficiency, technology-based behavioural health interventions are gaining traction as therapeutic resources, both as stand-alone technology or as multi component interventions [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Reflecting on this trend, there are reviews on the efficacy of stand-alone technology apps intervention or multicomponent intervention on healthy lifestyles [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], but still, the developing literature base on technology-based intervention has primarily focused on disease prevention [29,38,42,43], weight management [15,16,18,44,45] or lifestyle improvement outcomes [17,19,44,46], and in many ways has not yet explicated the important implications for a stand-alone technology intervention on healthy food purchases and healthy food consumption outcomes. Along with the relative lack of attention, specifically on healthy food purchasing and consumption, this review paper poses the following important research questions: Are technology app-based interventions effective enough to support healthy food purchase and consumption when compared with the traditional interventions such as face-to-face counselling, literature and group-based education?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we are aware that that visits free of charge improve the outcomes of a BWRP [36]. However, the out-patient clinic visits were also cost-free (i.e., covered by the National Health System).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A larger number of apps might increase screen time, which is itself associated with overweight, obesity, and physical inactivity ( 23 ). However, Delli Bovi et al ( 24 ) recently showed that when a healthy lifestyle application was used, there was no significant difference in screen time in the control group and the test group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%