Abstract:There is robust evidence that higher income makes people evaluate their lives more favorably, but there is no consistent evidence on whether it makes people feel better. Analyzing data from five large surveys spanning 162 countries, we predicted and found the most comprehensive evidence to date that income reliably predicted greater positive self-regard emotions (e.g., pride) and lower negative self-regard emotions (e.g., anxiety). In contrast, its relationships with other-regard emotions (e.g., gratitude, ang… Show more
“…Analyses were then performed using the lavaan package on R , and a latent variable cross-lagged panel model was examined to test long-term bidirectional relationships between emotional ambivalence and psychological well-being about a decade later after controlling for baselines. This analytic strategy is well-validated and consistent with many other recent analyses of the MIDUS dataset (Dewitte et al, 2020 ; Hartanto et al, 2019 ; Tong et al, 2021 ; Wiese et al, 2019 ) as well as of other longitudinal datasets (Orth et al, 2021 ). 5 Additionally, we addressed missing data using full information maximum likelihood (FIML) procedures, which are widely considered the gold standard for handling missing data (Enders & Bandalos, 2001 ).…”
Section: Studysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A battery of commonly felt emotion items were administered to assess the degree to which participants felt various positive, negative, and mixed emotions. Similar to approaches utilized in previous research (Kuppens et al, 2008 ; Nezlek & Kuppens, 2008 ; Tong et al, 2021 ), items were selected to capture a range of common items that represent distinct positive, negative, and mixed emotional states to provide more precise and reliable estimates of each valence. Participants were asked to rate whether they felt each emotion “ right now ” on a seven-point Likert scale, with the following anchors: 1 ( Do not feel the emotion at all ), 4 ( Feel the emotion moderately ), and 7 ( Feel the emotion very much ).…”
Conflicting perspectives on whether mixed emotions are adaptive states which promote integrative processes or uncomfortable states which are agonizing make divergent predictions on whether mixed emotions in daily life are conducive towards psychological well-being. We examined this across three studies. Study 1 (
N
= 335, 135 males;
M
age
= 41.31) examined associations between state mixed emotions and psychological well-being. Study 2 (
N
= 389; 160 males;
M
age
= 40.86) examined associations between workplace-specific mixed emotions and workplace ill-being assessed based on burnout. Both direct measures and indirect measures were examined in Study 1 and 2, allowing some comparison of methodological issues related to their predictive validity. Study 3 (
N
= 3444; 1587 males;
M
age
= 55.34) examined bidirectional relationships between an index of emotional ambivalence and psychological well-being about ten years later, controlling for baselines. Demographic covariates, positive emotions, and negative emotions were controlled for in all studies. Analyses were performed using latent variable structural equation modelling. After adjusting for all covariates, the direct measures of mixed emotions predicted poorer psychological well-being (Study 1) and greater burnout (Study 2). However, indirect measures were found to suffer from relatively greater multicollinearity and poorer predictive validity upon controlling for positive and negative emotions. In Study 3, emotional ambivalence predicted poorer long-term psychological well-being, while psychological well-being also predicted lower emotional ambivalence, supporting bidrectionality. The findings provide preliminary evidence that naturalistically experienced mixed emotions may be conflicting and unpleasant, with potentially negative implications for psychological well-being over and above positive and negative emotions.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10902-021-00493-z.
“…Analyses were then performed using the lavaan package on R , and a latent variable cross-lagged panel model was examined to test long-term bidirectional relationships between emotional ambivalence and psychological well-being about a decade later after controlling for baselines. This analytic strategy is well-validated and consistent with many other recent analyses of the MIDUS dataset (Dewitte et al, 2020 ; Hartanto et al, 2019 ; Tong et al, 2021 ; Wiese et al, 2019 ) as well as of other longitudinal datasets (Orth et al, 2021 ). 5 Additionally, we addressed missing data using full information maximum likelihood (FIML) procedures, which are widely considered the gold standard for handling missing data (Enders & Bandalos, 2001 ).…”
Section: Studysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A battery of commonly felt emotion items were administered to assess the degree to which participants felt various positive, negative, and mixed emotions. Similar to approaches utilized in previous research (Kuppens et al, 2008 ; Nezlek & Kuppens, 2008 ; Tong et al, 2021 ), items were selected to capture a range of common items that represent distinct positive, negative, and mixed emotional states to provide more precise and reliable estimates of each valence. Participants were asked to rate whether they felt each emotion “ right now ” on a seven-point Likert scale, with the following anchors: 1 ( Do not feel the emotion at all ), 4 ( Feel the emotion moderately ), and 7 ( Feel the emotion very much ).…”
Conflicting perspectives on whether mixed emotions are adaptive states which promote integrative processes or uncomfortable states which are agonizing make divergent predictions on whether mixed emotions in daily life are conducive towards psychological well-being. We examined this across three studies. Study 1 (
N
= 335, 135 males;
M
age
= 41.31) examined associations between state mixed emotions and psychological well-being. Study 2 (
N
= 389; 160 males;
M
age
= 40.86) examined associations between workplace-specific mixed emotions and workplace ill-being assessed based on burnout. Both direct measures and indirect measures were examined in Study 1 and 2, allowing some comparison of methodological issues related to their predictive validity. Study 3 (
N
= 3444; 1587 males;
M
age
= 55.34) examined bidirectional relationships between an index of emotional ambivalence and psychological well-being about ten years later, controlling for baselines. Demographic covariates, positive emotions, and negative emotions were controlled for in all studies. Analyses were performed using latent variable structural equation modelling. After adjusting for all covariates, the direct measures of mixed emotions predicted poorer psychological well-being (Study 1) and greater burnout (Study 2). However, indirect measures were found to suffer from relatively greater multicollinearity and poorer predictive validity upon controlling for positive and negative emotions. In Study 3, emotional ambivalence predicted poorer long-term psychological well-being, while psychological well-being also predicted lower emotional ambivalence, supporting bidrectionality. The findings provide preliminary evidence that naturalistically experienced mixed emotions may be conflicting and unpleasant, with potentially negative implications for psychological well-being over and above positive and negative emotions.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10902-021-00493-z.
“…Furthermore, women with a higher level of education and/or income found it less important that a chaperone was present, that a garment was offered to protect their modesty, or that the GE took place in a designated examination room. This may be because these women have greater self‐confidence 35 and feel less insecure in the presence of health professionals.…”
ObjectiveGynecological examinations (GEs) are challenging for many women. Several recommendations and guidelines have emerged, partly based on common sense and clinicians' consensus. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding women's opinions. Therefore, this study aimed to describe women's preferences and experiences in relation to GEs and investigate whether they are dependent on their socioeconomic status.MethodsIn Denmark, GEs are typically performed by general practitioners or resident specialists in gynecology (RSGs) in gynecological hospital departments. This cross‐sectional questionnaire and register study included approximately 3000 randomly selected patients who visited six RSGs from January 1, 2020, to March 1, 2021. The main outcome measurement involved women's preferences and experiences regarding GEs.ResultsOverall, 37% of the women thought that a changing room was important, 20% preferred a garment to cover themselves, 18% preferred a separate examination room, and 13% thought that the presence of a chaperone was important. Compared with working and retired women, more women outside the workforce felt insufficiently informed, considered their experience with RSGs unprofessional, and found GEs painful.ConclusionOur results support existing recommendations regarding GEs and the related environment, confirming that privacy and modesty are factors to take into consideration as they are of concern for a relatively large group of women. Thus, providers should focus on women outside the workforce, because this group appears to feel vulnerable in this environment.
“…Interestingly, income was associated with Arabicization, where lower barriers were associated with high income, followed by middle and then low income. This could be related to feeling more empowered financially, which could reflect more courage to carry on with behaviors that are perceived as different or controversial ( Jahan et al., 2015 ; Tong et al., 2021 ). As well, living in the suburbs was associated with a significantly more favorable attitude toward Arabicized medical terms, which could point to being more attached to the traditional social values of the Arabic culture of Jordan and being less exposed to foreignization when living in the more harmonized and probably, monotonous suburban environment.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.