2021
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Clinical Benefit of Integrative Genomic Profiling in Advanced Solid Tumors

Abstract: Key Points Question What is the clinical utility of genomic profiling for patients with advanced solid tumors? Findings In this cohort study of 1015 patients who underwent integrative genomic profiling, a high rate of pathogenic germline variants and a subset of patients who derive substantial clinical benefit from sequencing information were identified. Meaning These findings support (1) directed germline testing for inherited c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
128
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
128
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, extensive testing is required to select only a few treatable patients. Nevertheless, we expect that screening gene alterations or amplifications by next-generation sequencing techniques may become routine in the near future and will allow us to detect several targets simultaneously [15,16]. Indeed, only 31% of patients with MET-amplified tumor were enrolled in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, extensive testing is required to select only a few treatable patients. Nevertheless, we expect that screening gene alterations or amplifications by next-generation sequencing techniques may become routine in the near future and will allow us to detect several targets simultaneously [15,16]. Indeed, only 31% of patients with MET-amplified tumor were enrolled in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical trials have indicated that using multi-gene testing to personalize cancer therapies can have a positive impact on tumor response rates and patient progression-free survival, as well as on finding new molecularly-targeted treatment indications [140][141][142]. Multi-gene testing is considered the most appropriate option for patients with advanced or metastatic cancers with limited standard-of-care options in order to assess several actionable genomic alterations at the same time [143].…”
Section: Clinical Utility Of Multi-gene Testing For Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) plays a fundamental role in this phase of development of precision medicine both to ensure the prescriptive appropriateness of the CGP tests and to warrant the correct interpretation of the test results and their clinical application. In fact, many clinicians have limited confidence in the interpretation of multigene next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests [9,10].…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%