Using a Clinical Workflow Analysis to Enhance eHealth Implementation Planning: Tutorial and Case Study

Abstract

eHealth apps often fail to improve clinical outcomes due to poor integration with clinical workflow—the sequence and personnel needed to undertake a series of tasks for clinical care. Our central thesis is that eHealth interventions will be more effective if the clinical workflow is studied and taken into consideration for intervention implementation. This paper aims to provide an introductory tutorial on when and how to use a clinical workflow analysis to guide the implementation of eHealth interventions. The tutorial includes a step-by-step guide to conducting a clinical workflow analysis in planning for eHealth implementation. We began with a description of why a clinical workflow analysis is best completed before the implementation of eHealth interventions. Next, we described 4 steps needed to perform the clinical workflow analysis: the identification of discrete workflow components, workflow assessment, triangulation, and the stakeholder proposal of intervention implementation. Finally, we presented a case study of a clinical workflow analysis, which was conducted during patient visits of patients aged 11 or 12 years from 4 diverse pediatric or family medicine clinics to plan the implementation of a tablet-based app for adolescent vaccination. Investigators planning the implementation of new eHealth interventions in health care settings can use the presented steps to assess clinical workflow, thereby maximizing the match of their intervention with the clinical workflow. Conducting a prospective workflow study allows for evidence-based planning, identifying potential pitfalls, and increasing stakeholder buy-in and engagement. This tutorial should aid investigators in increasing the successful implementation of eHealth interventions.

A Scoping Review of mHealth Interventions for Secondary Prevention of Stroke: Implications for Policy and Practice

“…48,49 Additionally, including clinicians in this development process improves integration into existing workflows and interoperability, leading to improved uptake. 50,51 An important consideration in implementation is providing equitable access to care, that is, people living with stroke who do not own a device (eg, smartphone) should still be provided access to programs. Nearly half the publications (5/13) required participants or their caregivers to have access to technology, and when the technology was provided by the caregiver, they had to be present at all times for the participant to receive the intervention.…”

Pediatric primary care provider and staff perspectives on the implementation of electronic health record-based social needs interventions: A mixed-methods study

“…To better understand the context for implementation, we observed well-child visit workflows at each of the four clinics. We used a standardized patient tracking form and followed published guidance for using clinical workflow assessments to inform implementation planning [30]. During the study period, the SDoH questionnaire was not a component of standard care, but other screening questionnaires (i.e., Bright Futures health risk assessment) were assigned for all well-child visits [21].…”

Principles for Designing and Developing a Workflow Monitoring Tool to Enable and Enhance Clinical Workflow Automation

“…bottlenecks. While studies have been using clinical workflow analysis to support workflow automation and provide evidence-based planning such as 39 our study takes the workflow analysis into the next level and advocates for continuous monitoring, detailed understanding, and user-centered feedback loops.…”