2021
DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of a low frame rate protocol for percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimization of fluoroscopic protocols could be considered a new fundamental step to provide a greater reduction in radiation dose without hampering outcomes. In the last few years several studies have been published comparing the effectiveness and safety of low dose fluoroscopic protocols: whilst there is firm evidence for the 7.5 fps fluoroscopic protocols, 6,7 data on 3.75 fps protocols are lacking. Despite the retrospective nature of the study, no difference in the baseline characteristics of the population were found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization of fluoroscopic protocols could be considered a new fundamental step to provide a greater reduction in radiation dose without hampering outcomes. In the last few years several studies have been published comparing the effectiveness and safety of low dose fluoroscopic protocols: whilst there is firm evidence for the 7.5 fps fluoroscopic protocols, 6,7 data on 3.75 fps protocols are lacking. Despite the retrospective nature of the study, no difference in the baseline characteristics of the population were found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 2 3 ] Multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) occurs in 40–50% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). [ 4 5 6 ] Previous studies have shown that complete revascularization is associated with lower rates of long-term adverse events when compared with incomplete revascularization. [ 7 , 8 ] However, quite a few CAD patients are unable to achieve complete revascularization because of the adverse characteristics pertinent to the lesions and the systemic background of the patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%