2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tough Tradeoffs: Coca crops and agrarian alternatives in Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Colombia in particular has a long history of cocaine trade and continues to be involved in its production and cultivation ( 10 ). Twitter and scientific articles discuss the complex sociopolitical context of cocaine crops in this country, analyzing the problem comprehensively ( 50 , 51 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colombia in particular has a long history of cocaine trade and continues to be involved in its production and cultivation ( 10 ). Twitter and scientific articles discuss the complex sociopolitical context of cocaine crops in this country, analyzing the problem comprehensively ( 50 , 51 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are comparable to those reported by Franklin and Pindyck (2018), who estimated the present value of lost economic benefits per hectare of deforestation at 3789 US$ per hectare for seven ESs in the great Amazon basin across nine countries. Higher colonization pressures may explain the remarkably high deforestation rates in the departments of Caquetá and Putumayo, together with the expansion of the frontiers of agriculture and intensified illegal coca growing (Correa-Ayram et al, 2020;Gutiérrez-Sanín, 2021).…”
Section: Natural Capital Losses In the Colombia Amazon Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst domestic UK drug market violence related to cocaine powder is lower relative to crack cocaine (and other drugs such as heroin), the international market is lucrative, and so is characterised by a high level of societal harm, including violence; human rights violations; stalling of economic development goals; environmental damage from drug production and crop eradication; militarisation of criminal markets and law enforcement responses; and state corruption (e.g. Aziani, 2020;Burns-Edel, 2016;Guti errez-San ın, 2021;Keefer et al, 2008;Salisbury and Fagan, 2013;UNODC, 2006UNODC, , 2010Werb et al, 2011). Whilst there is little evidence to suggest that international drug control has been effective in disrupting the global supply of cocaine, paradoxically, prohibition, enforcement, and other policy actions may have promoted harm as both the risks of market participation and financial rewards have increased (Werb et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%