2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axonal damage and behavioral deficits in rats with repetitive exposure of the brain to laser-induced shock waves: Effects of inter-exposure time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because LISW is not accompanied by wind (dynamic pressure) and its energy is spatially confined, both the effects of wind and exposure of other tissues can be excluded in principle. This would offer a unique advantage in using LISWs to study traumatic injury caused by explosions 37 . With shock or blast tubes, it is difficult to completely exclude the tertiary mechanism and exposure of untargeted tissues in animal experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because LISW is not accompanied by wind (dynamic pressure) and its energy is spatially confined, both the effects of wind and exposure of other tissues can be excluded in principle. This would offer a unique advantage in using LISWs to study traumatic injury caused by explosions 37 . With shock or blast tubes, it is difficult to completely exclude the tertiary mechanism and exposure of untargeted tissues in animal experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the scaling law, we believed that the appropriate shock wave duration to be applied to the mouse brain would be one-twentieth of the aforementioned durations, ranging from 12.5 μs to several hundred microseconds 40 . In this study, experiments were conducted according to the hypothesis that the force product is the most important parameter in determining damage 37 . We are currently studying the possibility of extending the time range, and we need to test the hypothesis with LISW using an optimal time range in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 29 , 132 , 147 Investigations also indicate heightened anxiety, motor impairments, and fear responses during subacute and chronic time points. 29 , 132 , 159–162 , 164 166 …”
Section: Repetitive Blast-induced Neurotrauma Using Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Окрім загального впливу ВХ, дослідження повторюваної ВІНТ показали, що інтервал часу між ВХ має кумулятивний вплив на мозок, що призводить до більш серйозних і тривалих неврологічних пошкоджень [18]. Це пояснюється тим, що мозок не має достатньо часу, щоб повністю відновитися від пошкод-жень, спричинених попереднім впливом, а наступні впливи ВХ можуть посилити наявні пошкодження [18].…”
Section: теоретична і експериментальна медицина 9 Theoretical and Exp...unclassified