Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol

Bayliss, Luke T.; Lamont‐Mills, Andrea; Plessis, Carol du; Morgan, Talia

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043649

Cited by 9 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A strength of this review was working to an a priori peer reviewed published protocol [ 24 ]. Rationale for modifications from the protocol has been provided, including the addition of a stage that was the amended and re-run search strategy to capture additional studies ( n = 33) that brought the review up to date.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The protocol for this scoping review has previously been published [ 24 ] and was based on Arksey and O’Malley’s [ 25 ] scoping review methodology, with Levac et al’s [ 26 ] and Peters et al’s [ 23 ] recommendations being adopted.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On 14 December 2020, the first and second author (LTB and SC hereafter) independently conducted the search for relevant studies using the search strategy (i.e., suicid* AND attempt* AND capa* OR “access to means”) as outlined in [ 24 ]. Search results were recorded in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Suicide capability within the ideation-to-action framework: A systematic scoping review

Bayliss

Christensen²,

Lamont‐Mills³

et al. 2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Suicide capability is theorised to facilitate the movement from suicidal ideation to suicide attempt. Three types of contributors are posited to comprise suicide capability: acquired, dispositional, and practical. Despite suicide capability being critical in the movement from ideation-to-attempt, there has been no systematic synthesis of empirical evidence relating to suicide capability that would enable further development and refinement of the concept. This study sought to address this synthesis gap. A scoping review was conducted on suicide capability studies published January 2005 to January 2022. Eleven electronic databases and grey literature sources were searched returning 5,212 potential studies. After exclusion criteria application, 90 studies were included for final analysis. Results synthesis followed a textual narrative approach allocating studies based on contributors of suicide capability. Most studies focused on investigating only one factor within contributors. Painful and provocative events appear to contribute to acquired capability more so than fearlessness about death. Whilst emerging evidence for dispositional and practical contributors is promising, the small number of studies prevents further conclusions from being drawn. An unexpected additional cognitive contributor was identified. The focus of a single factor from most studies and the limited number of studies on contributors other than acquired capability limits the theoretical development and practical application of suicide capability knowledge. Given that suicide is a complex and multifaceted behaviour, future research that incorporates a combination of contributors is more likely to advance our understandings of suicide capability.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Suicide capability within the ideation-to-action framework: A systematic scoping review

Bayliss

Christensen²,

Lamont‐Mills³

et al. 2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A quality assessment limitation will also be implemented during the search stage. Although quality or critical assessment of studies is not a scoping review requirement [ 56 , 57 ], some published scoping review protocols [ 68 , 69 ] and reviews [ 70 – 73 ] include such an assessment. Further, as one of the purposes of the proposed review is to identify gaps in the literature, quality assessment has been recommended in such situations [ 74 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Online suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours talk: A scoping review protocol

Lamont‐Mills

Bayliss²,

Christensen³

2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The anonymity that the internet and social media affords users means that suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours can be talked about with a sense of freedom and disinhibition that is often not possible in face-to-face contexts. Better understanding online suicidal thoughts and/or behaviour talk is critical as more people turn to online spaces for support. Without this the potentiality of such spaces as sites for suicide prevention and intervention is likely to remain unrealised. Currently there are no scoping or systematic review syntheses focusing on internet and/or on social media suicidal thoughts and/or behaviour talk. This lack of synthesis is problematic as it makes it more difficult for online suicide prevention and intervention practices, policies, and our understanding of suicide to advance in a coherent and evidence-based manner. A scoping review protocol following Arksey and O’Malley’s six-step modified framework has been developed to address this synthesis gap. It aims to systematically map the empirical literature that has investigated online suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours talk. It is anticipated that review outcomes could inform the training of health practitioners and peer/professional online moderators in how to best talk with people experiencing suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours. Outcomes could also form an evidence-base for developing policies and practices that focus on online places as safe spaces to talk about suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours. Developers of safe language guidelines could also use the outcomes to audit how well current guidelines reflect empirical evidence. Outcomes could enable researchers to design future online suicidal thoughts and/behaviours talk studies that extend our understandings of suicide leading to potential refinements of contemporary suicide theories/models.

show abstract

“…To date, a certain body of evidence has been accumulated on the characteristics of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt in different populations; however, the literature on this topic has some limitations. First, most studies have considered nonclinical samples and examined risk factors for suicidal ideation in general, without differentiating suicidal attempters from ideators [ 15 , 90 ]. Nevertheless, according to the ideation-to-action framework, it is necessary to expand the research on the specific factors associated with suicide attempt or mere suicidal ideation, as several different variables could be involved in the path from suicidal thoughts to suicidal acts [ 15 , 91 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Pre-Adolescent and Adolescent Clinical Sample Study about Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempt, and Self-Harming

Raffagnato

Iannattone

Fasolato

et al. 2022

EJIHPE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Suicide is the second cause of death among adolescents, and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is one of the main risk factors for suicidal behavior. However, the possible variables specifically associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempt, as well as the psychopathological characteristics linked to the concomitant presence of suicidal ideation/attempt and NSSI are still under-investigated in youth. The current study aimed to address these issues in a sample of 174 young Italian inpatients (Mage = 14.3 years ± 1.93, 78.2% girls). Sociodemographic and clinical variables were assessed through psycho-diagnostic interviews and ad hoc questionnaires. A binomial logistic regression was performed to identify the predictors of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt. Then, Kruskal–Wallis tests were run to analyze the psychopathological differences between patients with suicidal ideation and suicide attempt considering the coexistence of NSSI. The results highlighted that previous access to child mental health services and general psychopathological problems significantly predicted suicidal ideation, while previous hospitalizations, borderline personality functioning, and affective disorders significantly predicted suicide attempt. In general, inpatients with also NSSI reported higher levels of internalizing, somatic and total problems, impulsiveness, alexithymia, and emotional dysregulation. The clinical implications of our findings in terms of primary and secondary preventive programs are discussed.

show abstract

Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol

Cited by 9 publications

References 45 publications

Suicide capability within the ideation-to-action framework: A systematic scoping review

Suicide capability within the ideation-to-action framework: A systematic scoping review

Online suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours talk: A scoping review protocol

A Pre-Adolescent and Adolescent Clinical Sample Study about Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempt, and Self-Harming

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About