The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40266-020-00809-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-Generation Androgen Receptor-Signaling Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Older Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an unmet need for assessing the potential benefits of lower-dose anticancer treatments, particularly in frail or comorbid patients 29 who may experience substantial toxicity when given registered doses. 30 31 The development of anticancer drugs continues to rely on historical paradigms for cytotoxic chemotherapy (maximum tolerated dose, MTD) which is rarely reconsidered after approval or labelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an unmet need for assessing the potential benefits of lower-dose anticancer treatments, particularly in frail or comorbid patients 29 who may experience substantial toxicity when given registered doses. 30 31 The development of anticancer drugs continues to rely on historical paradigms for cytotoxic chemotherapy (maximum tolerated dose, MTD) which is rarely reconsidered after approval or labelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for drug switches were not known in our study. Given the respective safety profiles of ABI and ENZ, including cardiac disorders or cognitive disorders 14,22,23 , the occurrence of adverse drug reactions among patients with comorbidities cannot be excluded and could be a factor for definitive discontinuation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When analysed holistically, the three drugs share significant efficacy by measure of MFS; all three increased MFS by approximately 2 years MFS compared with placebo. 24,25 At a more granular level, a recent network meta-analysis showed that enzalutamide had a slight advantage in MFS and time to PSA progression over darolutamide, but no significant differences were observed between enzalutamide and apalutamide. 26 This sort of analysis is insufficient to inform treatment selection.…”
Section: Considerations In Therapy Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%