2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.122540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated mass spectrometry multi-attribute method analyses for process development and characterization of mAbs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is highly relevant since we used LC gradients of approximately 60 min length, meaning that when a high number of samples need to be analysed, the last ones in the sample queue will stay at 4°C for a significant amount of time. Although we did follow all the PQAs reported in Tables 3 and 4 , oxidation levels were the ones where this factor showed higher impact, with several values above the 5% threshold ( Fig 2A ) , probably because these PQA levels are reported as highly susceptible to artificial modifications [ 22 , 31 , 32 ]. Indeed, mAb S oxidation (and deamidation) levels are highly affected by the time the sample is waiting in the auto-sampler, presenting different fold changes depending on the amino acid where the modification is found ( Fig 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is highly relevant since we used LC gradients of approximately 60 min length, meaning that when a high number of samples need to be analysed, the last ones in the sample queue will stay at 4°C for a significant amount of time. Although we did follow all the PQAs reported in Tables 3 and 4 , oxidation levels were the ones where this factor showed higher impact, with several values above the 5% threshold ( Fig 2A ) , probably because these PQA levels are reported as highly susceptible to artificial modifications [ 22 , 31 , 32 ]. Indeed, mAb S oxidation (and deamidation) levels are highly affected by the time the sample is waiting in the auto-sampler, presenting different fold changes depending on the amino acid where the modification is found ( Fig 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, MAM has also the ability to search for sequence variants, critical for mAb biological function [ 11 , 20 , 21 ]. Therefore, by streamlining monitoring and quality control analysis, MAM has the potential to accelerate mAbs’ process development and manufacturing, contributing to reduce the risk of failure and costs associated with analytical characterization during bioprocess development, product release, and in-process control [ 6 , 9 , 22 ]. MAM has been increasingly used for routine PQA analysis [ 18 ] keeping up with the growth and increased acceptance of MS methods in the biopharmaceutical field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The complexity of LC-MS systems for glycopeptide analysis has necessitated the use of simplified mass spectrometers and analytical workflows capable of performing analyses at intact subunit, peptide and released glycan level with optimised compliance-ready workflows (Rogers et al, 2018). These workflows are known as multi-attribute monitoring (MAM) and they can be performed with mass spectrometers and have been used to identify biotherapeutic attributes such as deamidation, oxidation, pyroglutamate formation, lysine clipping, aspartate isomerization and glycosylation in one analysis (Song et al, 2021). In most instances, the accurate mass of the peptides and PTMs are compared and validated by cross-referencing these measurements to a curated database.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most instances, the accurate mass of the peptides and PTMs are compared and validated by cross-referencing these measurements to a curated database. MAM is being increasingly adopted within the biopharmaceutical industry because in principle the analytical workflows which include sample preparation and data processing techniques and instrumentation are robust enough to be harmonized across the biologic development value chain and across different manufacturing sites (Song et al, 2021). This harmonization decreases the cost of assay development; however, there is the potential challenge that these techniques can miss unexpected PTMs such as glycosylation which may not be described in the analytical databases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%