Gender-based analysis of the academic paediatric radiation oncology workforce

McClelland, Shearwood; Huang, Christina; Zellars, Richard C.; Jaboin, Jerry J.

doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139543

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The statistically significant under-representation of women at the full professor and department chair levels is similar to findings from previous literature as well as from a recent examination of breast cancer and genitourinary cancer radiation oncologists [13][14][15] ; this under-representation has been less prominent in pediatric radiation oncology. 16 The fact that the odds of male radiation oncologists being full professor are 78% higher than the odds of female radiation oncologists, and are 3.8 times larger for being department chairs than women remains troubling, as it may represent the notion of a glass ceiling separating associate professorship from higher ranks for female radiation oncologists. This may in turn reflect the robust evidence that certain challenges are documented to be disproportionately faced by women, including unconscious biases, overt discrimination and harassment, and gendered societal expectations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Composition of the Current Academic Radiation Oncology Workforce in Comprehensive Cancer Centers

McClelland

Huang

Griffith

et al. 2022

JCO Oncology Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE: The landscape of the profession of academic radiation oncology is constantly changing. We sought to determine the demographic makeup of the current academic radiation oncology workforce. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Internet web site searches of the 51 National Cancer Institute–designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) were conducted in September 2019. The Scopus database was subsequently searched in December 2019 to ascertain the h-index for each radiation oncologist. Geographic location was economically stratified (New York, California, Massachusetts, Illinois, and Washington DC) as previously reported. Race and binary sex were attributed by authors using publicly available information. Univariate analysis involved the chi-square test; a multivariable model considered several factors including rank and sex. RESULTS: Of 993 radiation oncologists at CCCs, 53.6% are junior faculty, 24.8% associate professors, and 21.7% full professors. The average radiation oncologist at a CCC has been a physician for 19.7 (standard deviation = 11.3) years; 4.7% (47/993) are under-represented minorities. 24.6% of men and 15.5% of women were full professors, a statistically significant difference ( P = .001). Of the 51 department chairs, 11.8% are women and 5.6% are under-represented minorities. There are fewer female than male program directors in the most economically stratified locations ( P = .02). The mean h-index for all faculty is 17.6 (standard deviation = 16.9), and significantly differs between junior faculty (8.21), associate professors (18.46), and full professors (40.05; P < .0001). It also differs between men (19.35) and women (14.11). On multivariable analysis, sex, academic rank, and a secondary advanced degree were independently significant correlates of h-index. CONCLUSION: Among academic radiation oncologists at CCCs, under 5% are under-represented minorities, men are significantly over-represented among senior faculty, and women have significantly lower h-indices than men.

show abstract