2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the effective connectivity of premotor areas during real vs imagined grasping: a DCM-PEB approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the second (group) level, we constructed a PEB model over the first-level estimated parameters. In accordance with previous studies (Bencivenga et al, 2021; Rupprechter et al, 2020), we evaluated the explained variance by the model on the individual level - higher values reflect better model inversion (Zeidman et al, 2019a) – and then we only included subjects with >10% of explained variance in the PEB model. A total of 118 subjects (56 males, age: mean ± SEM = 21.57 ± 0.21 years) were included for further analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the second (group) level, we constructed a PEB model over the first-level estimated parameters. In accordance with previous studies (Bencivenga et al, 2021; Rupprechter et al, 2020), we evaluated the explained variance by the model on the individual level - higher values reflect better model inversion (Zeidman et al, 2019a) – and then we only included subjects with >10% of explained variance in the PEB model. A total of 118 subjects (56 males, age: mean ± SEM = 21.57 ± 0.21 years) were included for further analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted August 2, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.30.502169 doi: bioRxiv preprint 2016). Finally, Bayesian model Average (BMA) was used to calculate the average parameter values across the 256 models from the final iteration of the automatic search procedure, and a threshold based on the model evidence was used to keep only parameters with strong evidence, i.e., posterior probability > 0.95, which indicates the probability of a parameter being present vs. absent (Bencivenga et al, 2021;Zeidman et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Dcm Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 presents the topographic channel plots (topoplots) that contain the relevant activated scalp areas that are inferred from the extracted FC measures, principally contributing to the discriminability between labeled motor-related tasks. We also include the most relevant pairwise functional connectivity links between electrodes that are estimated to fulfill the 99 percentile of the normalized relevance weights values (between 0 to 1) computed from Equation (6). The background stands for the accumulated relevance that is mapped to the channel positions.…”
Section: Dbii Me Dbiii MImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MI and ME share common sensorimotor areas, and they both involve planning and executing the same motor plan, but their neural mechanisms have some differences [3,4]. In practice, to indicate that motor learning had taken place and retained after a training phase, motor execution performance is measured [5,6]. Moreover, the brain plasticity that is induced by motor learning can be associated with significant changes in electroencephalographic (EEG) features, particularly in the preexecution phase [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation