Negative and Positive Affect Regulation in a Transdiagnostic Internet-Based Protocol for Emotional Disorders: Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background Emotional disorders (EDs) are among the most prevalent mental disorders. Existing evidence-based psychological treatments are not sufficient to reduce the disease burden of mental disorders. It is therefore essential to implement innovative solutions to achieve a successful dissemination of psychological treatment protocols, and in this regard, the use of information and communication technologies such as the internet can be very useful. Furthermore, the literature suggests that not everyone with an ED receives the appropriate treatment. This situation has led to the development of new intervention proposals based on the transdiagnostic perspective, which attempts to address the underlying processes common to EDs. Most of these transdiagnostic interventions focus primarily on downregulating negative affectivity (NA), and less attention has been paid to strengths and the upregulation of positive affectivity, despite its importance for well-being and mental health. Objective This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a transdiagnostic internet-based treatment for EDs in a community sample. Methods A 3-armed randomized controlled trial was conducted. A total of 216 participants were randomly assigned to a transdiagnostic internet-based protocol (TIBP), a TIBP+ positive affect (PA) component, or a waiting list (WL) control group. The treatment protocol contained core components mainly addressed to downregulate NA (ie, present-focused emotional awareness and acceptance, cognitive flexibility, behavioral and emotional avoidance patterns, and interoceptive and situational exposure) as well as a PA regulation component to promote psychological strengths and enhance well-being. Data on depression, anxiety, quality of life, neuroticism and extraversion, and PA/NA before and after treatment were analyzed. Expectations and opinions of treatment were also analyzed. Results Within-group comparisons indicated significant pre-post reductions in the two experimental conditions. In the TIBP+PA condition, the effect sizes were large for all primary outcomes (d=1.42, Beck Depression Inventory [BDI-II]; d=0.91, Beck Anxiety Inventory [BAI]; d=1.27, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Positive [PANAS-P]; d=1.26, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Negative [PANAS-N]), whereas the TIBP condition yielded large effect sizes for BDI-II (d=1.19) and PANAS-N (d=1.28) and medium effect sizes for BAI (d=0.63) and PANAS-P (d=0.69). Between-group comparisons revealed that participants who received one of the two active treatments scored better at posttreatment than WL participants. Although there were no statistically significant differences between the two intervention groups on the PA measure, effect sizes were consistently larger in the TIBP+PA condition than in the standard transdiagnostic protocol. Conclusions Overall, the findings indicate that EDs can be effectively treated with a transdiagnostic intervention via the internet, as significant improvements in depression, anxiety, and quality of life measures were observed. Regarding PA measures, promising effects were found, but more research is needed to study the role of PA as a therapeutic component. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02578758; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02578758 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.1186/s12888-017-1297-z

A cross-sectional comparison of perceived stress and emotional affect between adults with and without emotional disturbances using a novel coping strategy.

“…The instrument has high internal consistency and intercorrelations when assessing effect within a few weeks (PA=.87, NA=.87, and r=-.22) (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988). Prior research has demonstrated PANAS to be correlated with the Beck Anxiety Inventory, State Anxiety Scale, and Beck Depression Inventory (Díaz-García et al, 2021;Díaz-García et al, 2020, Serafini, Malin-Mayor, Nich, Hunkele, & Carroll, 2016Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988).…”

“…Individuals with anxiety and depressive disorder demonstrate affective hyperactivity and describe feeling more threatened and less in control of their emotions when compared to nonanxious individuals (Llera & Newman, 2010). Moreover, individuals with anxiety or depressive disorders have a lower positive affect and higher negative affect compared to individuals without these disorders (Díaz-García et al, 2021;Díaz-García et al, 2020, Crawford & Henry, 2004Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988).…”

Efficacy of an internet-based psychological intervention for problem gambling and gambling disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

“…There will be five measurement points in the experimental condition (e.g., baseline, post-treatment, and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups). As in previous studies ( Díaz-García et al, 2021 ; Quiñonez-Freire et al, 2021 ; Mira et al, 2019a ), the post-treatment assessment of the intervention group will be performed individually depending on the completion speed, but the WL control group will be assessed at week twelve because it is the maximum time the experimental group has to finish the intervention. For ethical reasons, the individuals in the control group will be able to receive full access to the Internet-based psychological intervention after being on the waiting list for 12 weeks and filling out the post-treatment assessment.…”

Is there evidence that emotional reasoning processing underlies emotional disorders in adults? A systematic review

“…Most specifically, the transdiagnostic approach places the emphasis on the processes involved in predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating the development of a disorder (Bullis et al, 2019). Transdiagnostic interventions have been now effectively implemented in persons with both anxious and depressive symptomatology in different forms, including individual (Sakiris & Berle, 2019), group (Laposa et al, 2017;Talkovsky et al, 2017), or even online format (Díaz-García et al, 2021;Kladnitski et al, 2020;Weisel et al, 2019). They have also been implemented both in private (Bullis et al, 2014) and public settings (Osma et al, 2021) with excellent results.…”