“…However, interestingly, fibula nailing still had equivocal results to plating techniques, many even showing improved results when nailing over plating. 3 , 7 , 8 , 18 Rush rods, Ender nails, and Knowles pins are earlier intramedullary devices that were effective at aligning the fibula, but did not provide good rotational or axial stability. 4 We believe that a nail that provides both distal and proximal fixation is essential for rotational stability and length control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, operative treatment of unstable ankle fractures has been open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). 1 , 2 , 6 , 7 ORIF is performed to reduce the fracture anatomically under direct visualization, and plate fixation is the favored method to treat fibula fractures. 1 , 3 , 6 However, plate fixation may require extensile incisions through the skin and overlying soft tissue, elevation and stripping of adjacent musculature, periosteum, and blood supply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 , 3 , 16 Extensile incisions potentially require delayed surgical intervention because of soft tissue swelling, which increases the risk of wound healing complications. 7 Larger incisions may also increase postoperative pain and therefore need for more narcotics, increased postoperative swelling, and larger cosmetic scarring. 8 Additionally, the presence of a plate on the surface of the subcutaneous distal fibula may cause irritation and require removal, with an average removal rate reported at approximately 34.7% (12%-95.5%).…”
Background: Ankle fractures are a frequent injury in the adult population and a quarter of all ankle fractures are classified as unstable, requiring surgical intervention. Plate-and-screw construct is the traditionally used fixation method for fibula fractures. The use of an intramedullary nail is an alternative fixation method, with current literature supporting very low complication rates and hardware removal surgeries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes, including complication rates and implant removal rates, using a fibula nail with both proximal and distal fixation capabilities by an experienced surgeon. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 203 consecutive fibula nail cases from a single surgeon using a mini-open technique for anatomic reduction. Demographic, operative, clinical, and radiographic outcome data were analyzed, specifically examining complication rates and need for implant removal. Results: The average follow-up was 18.8 months (6-54 months). All fractures healed. We identified 2 cases of superficial wound infection, 1 superficial peroneal nerve irritation, and 1 case of implant removal. In the first 110 cases, 2 fractures were converted to a plate intraoperatively prior to a technique modification which has prevented this occurrence. No deep infection, delayed union, or nonunion occurred. Conclusion: Our data support that fibula nails with proximal and distal locking capabilities offer an alternative to plating with the potential for lower complication rates and lower need for implant removal. Level of evidence: Level IV, case series.
“…However, interestingly, fibula nailing still had equivocal results to plating techniques, many even showing improved results when nailing over plating. 3 , 7 , 8 , 18 Rush rods, Ender nails, and Knowles pins are earlier intramedullary devices that were effective at aligning the fibula, but did not provide good rotational or axial stability. 4 We believe that a nail that provides both distal and proximal fixation is essential for rotational stability and length control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, operative treatment of unstable ankle fractures has been open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). 1 , 2 , 6 , 7 ORIF is performed to reduce the fracture anatomically under direct visualization, and plate fixation is the favored method to treat fibula fractures. 1 , 3 , 6 However, plate fixation may require extensile incisions through the skin and overlying soft tissue, elevation and stripping of adjacent musculature, periosteum, and blood supply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 , 3 , 16 Extensile incisions potentially require delayed surgical intervention because of soft tissue swelling, which increases the risk of wound healing complications. 7 Larger incisions may also increase postoperative pain and therefore need for more narcotics, increased postoperative swelling, and larger cosmetic scarring. 8 Additionally, the presence of a plate on the surface of the subcutaneous distal fibula may cause irritation and require removal, with an average removal rate reported at approximately 34.7% (12%-95.5%).…”
Background: Ankle fractures are a frequent injury in the adult population and a quarter of all ankle fractures are classified as unstable, requiring surgical intervention. Plate-and-screw construct is the traditionally used fixation method for fibula fractures. The use of an intramedullary nail is an alternative fixation method, with current literature supporting very low complication rates and hardware removal surgeries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes, including complication rates and implant removal rates, using a fibula nail with both proximal and distal fixation capabilities by an experienced surgeon. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 203 consecutive fibula nail cases from a single surgeon using a mini-open technique for anatomic reduction. Demographic, operative, clinical, and radiographic outcome data were analyzed, specifically examining complication rates and need for implant removal. Results: The average follow-up was 18.8 months (6-54 months). All fractures healed. We identified 2 cases of superficial wound infection, 1 superficial peroneal nerve irritation, and 1 case of implant removal. In the first 110 cases, 2 fractures were converted to a plate intraoperatively prior to a technique modification which has prevented this occurrence. No deep infection, delayed union, or nonunion occurred. Conclusion: Our data support that fibula nails with proximal and distal locking capabilities offer an alternative to plating with the potential for lower complication rates and lower need for implant removal. Level of evidence: Level IV, case series.
“…However, the size of these slightly displaced PMFs (average size of 26% of articular surface) compares favorably with the size and orientation of small PMF present in rotational ankle injuries, which are also frequently not formally reduced or fixed and generally have acceptable outcomes when the ankle mortise is otherwise stable. [22][23][24] Of note, most of these fractures were assessed using radiographs alone, which likely underestimate the size of articular involvement compared with CT, 13,25 so these results should be reviewed in light of that limitation. In addition, because of variability in practice patterns between the emergency department staff, general surgery trauma team, and orthopaedic team, there were some preoperative CTs performed in patients without obvious fractures, indicating some heterogeneity in the decision to obtain a preoperative CT.…”
“…The differential diagnosis for ankle pain is broad and includes lateral ankle sprain and fibula fracture, two of the most common orthopedic injuries in urgent care settings. [1][2][3][4] In contrast, both primary and secondary tumors rarely occur near the ankle. Only 2.5% of all primary bone tumors are found in the fibula.…”
Case A 62-year-old woman presenting with ankle pain was initially treated for a non-displaced fracture. Persistent pain despite months of conservative management for her presumed injury prompted repeat radiographs which demonstrated the progression of a lytic lesion and led to an orthopedic oncology referral. Following a complete work-up, including biopsy and staging, she was diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the distal fibula. Conclusion Secondary tumors of the fibula are uncommon but an important diagnosis to consider for intractable lower extremity pain especially in patients with history of malignancy or lack of age-appropriate cancer screening.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.