2021
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30470-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nebulised heparin for patients with or at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Abstract: Background Mechanical ventilation in intensive care for 48 h or longer is associated with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which might be present at the time ventilatory support is instituted or develop afterwards, predominantly during the first 5 days. Survivors of prolonged mechanical ventilation and ARDS are at risk of considerably impaired physical function that can persist for years. An early pathogenic mechanism of lung injury in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients is inflamma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the half-life of pixatimod in mice is 38h ( 34 ), compared to 141h in human ( 13 ), future studies should adopt repeat-dose schedules to identify the optimal schedule in models of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We also suggest that direct intranasal delivery of pixatimod would be worth investigation, in view of recent positive data on the delivery of nebulized heparin for treatment of ARDS ( 36 ) which has significance for potential application of heparin in COVID-19 treatment (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Given the half-life of pixatimod in mice is 38h ( 34 ), compared to 141h in human ( 13 ), future studies should adopt repeat-dose schedules to identify the optimal schedule in models of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We also suggest that direct intranasal delivery of pixatimod would be worth investigation, in view of recent positive data on the delivery of nebulized heparin for treatment of ARDS ( 36 ) which has significance for potential application of heparin in COVID-19 treatment (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Its safety and usefulness were also confirmed at the early phase of COVID-19 infection. 12 Using such cheap and safe drugs during such challenging pandemic and a global risk of economic crises is of paramount importance (even in developed countries). So, it seems that nebulized UFH treatment is safe and effective in reducing O 2 need at Table 1 Pre-and post-nebulized unfractionated heparin (UFH) treatment days cases' oxygen saturation and need Days Nebulized UFH…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trial was conducted by Dixon et.al in 252 patients with or at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) while on Mechanical ventilation in intensive care unity [2131]. Dixon et.al wanted to see if Nebulised heparin can target fibrin deposition and limit the lung injury.…”
Section: A Nebulised Ufh In Ards Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%