Career aspirations among specialty residents in France: a cross-sectional gender-based comparison

Abstract

Background Most studies evaluating career aspirations among gender are performed in Anglo-Saxon countries. Two recent French studies looked at the career choice of residents in obstetrics & gynecology. It seemed useful to us to broaden this questioning to other specialties, by proposing a study to all residents in the same Faculty. The objective of our study was to describe residents’ career aspirations and possible barriers according to gender. Methods Declarative cross-sectional survey, using questionnaires sent by email to the specialty residents of the Faculty of Medicine of Lille (France). An analysis by specialty group (i.e., medicine, surgery, obstetrics & gynecology, and anesthesia & resuscitation) and a comparison of the results according to gender were performed. Results Of the 1384 specialty residents currently in training, 462 answered the questionnaire (33.38%), among whom 289 women and 173 men (average age = 27.08 ± 0.091 years). Seventeen women (5.9%) were currently considering a university hospital career versus 37 men (21.4%) (p = 0.001). Gender analysis made it possible to identify obstacles to engaging in a university career: lacking a female model, more frequent doubting the ability to undertake this type of career among women (61.6%) than men (35.3%) (p < 0.001), and gender discrimination felt in the workplace for 51.6% of women (versus 7.5% of men, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed specificities related to each specialty. Conclusions Few residents plan to embark upon a university hospital career, let alone female residents. There are considerations specific to each specialty and marked gender differences regarding career aspirations. Many features have been identified as obstacles to access to university hospital positions for women. It is important to develop strategies to remove these barriers and enable women to pursue such university careers. Trial registration Not applicable (no intervention).

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Among Anesthesiology Trainees

“… 23 , 24 Interventions to increase organizational support and leadership roles for women and others underrepresented in anesthesiology may reduce the burden of structural gender discrimination and increase workforce diversity. 25 …”

The Influence of the Student Exchange Program (Global UGRAD) on Career Aspirations Moderated by Self-Leadership among Alumni of the Global UGRAD Bachelor's Program

“…Career aspiration development can be influenced by various variables, including individuals' readiness to overcome obstacles that may arise during the Global UGRAD program. Other personal barriers such as self-doubt, lack of confidence if they do not have a mentor, and lack of support in college are possible obstacles in choosing a career [46]. Therefore, students who can adapt well to challenges during the exchange program may be more inclined to experience better personal and professional growth, such as career aspiration development.…”

COVID-19 and Access to Medical Professional Careers: Does Gender Matter?

“…However, the greater presence of women in the medical profession has not been reflected in a uniform distribution in professional practice according to the different medical [7] and surgical specialties [10][11][12]. Some studies suggest that this inequality is due to the different motivations, aspirations and/or preferences of men and women when choosing a career [7,[13][14][15][16]. Other studies place the origin of the inequality in the different stages of academic training [13,17,18].…”

“…Some studies suggest that this inequality is due to the different motivations, aspirations and/or preferences of men and women when choosing a career [7,[13][14][15][16]. Other studies place the origin of the inequality in the different stages of academic training [13,17,18]. In this line, the existing gender gap in the academic results obtained would be the predominant cause, justified on the basis of the different behavioral patterns of men and women in competitive situations [19,20].…”