2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-020-02673-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and technical limits of percutaneous pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 However, the trends were seen in PETD (where the mid-thoracic levels (T4 to T7) showed the lowest mean PETD values) were similar to the ones in the American, Indian, and French populations. 23 This trend is further supported by other researchers who stated that the mid-thoracic levels were the most susceptible site for a breach due to the narrowness of their pedicles. 24 This study on the Zimbabwean population suggests that to avoid medial and lateral breaches during pedicle screw placement, screws with a diameter of 5mm or less are used from T2-T10 while screws with a diameter of 7mm or less are used elsewhere (T1, T11, and T12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…22 However, the trends were seen in PETD (where the mid-thoracic levels (T4 to T7) showed the lowest mean PETD values) were similar to the ones in the American, Indian, and French populations. 23 This trend is further supported by other researchers who stated that the mid-thoracic levels were the most susceptible site for a breach due to the narrowness of their pedicles. 24 This study on the Zimbabwean population suggests that to avoid medial and lateral breaches during pedicle screw placement, screws with a diameter of 5mm or less are used from T2-T10 while screws with a diameter of 7mm or less are used elsewhere (T1, T11, and T12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…So far, the narrowest pedicles have been observed at the T3-T5 level, and there is considerable variability in the angles between the transverse pedicle axes and the PPSs. Moreover, it has been noted that the risk of screw malposition is significantly higher in the upper thoracic spine compared to the lower thoracic spine [35]. Our research did not include lateral decubitus PPS placements in this upper thoracic spine, potentially influencing the accuracy of our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Previous research has reported thoracic PPS misplacement rates ranging from 4.2% to 25.7% in the prone position [35][36][37][38]. These data were derived when patients were prone, casting doubt on their applicability in the lateral position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Higher misplacement rates are usually seen in the thoracic spine compared to the lumbar spine ( Winder and Gilhooly, 2017 ; Waschke et al, 2013 ; Charles et al, 2021 ). Charles et al found perforation rates of 16.7 % in the caudal thoracic spine (T7–T12) and 6.9 % in the lumbosacral spine (L1–S1) in an in vitro model for percutaneous placement of pedicle screws using fluoroscopic guidance ( Charles et al, 2021 ). In the current study the accuracy of pedicle screw placement was also significantly higher in the lumbar spine compared to the thoracic spine in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%