2021
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.142547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeting G1/S phase cell-cycle genomic alterations and accompanying co-alterations with individualized CDK4/6 inhibitor–based regimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of significantly co-altered genes within RET fusionpositive NSCLC samples may also provide insight into future directions in overcoming treatment resistance and a combination approach to improve outcomes in this patient population (58,59,61). It will also be important to follow the significance of RET amplifications regarding response to RET inhibition for various cancers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of significantly co-altered genes within RET fusionpositive NSCLC samples may also provide insight into future directions in overcoming treatment resistance and a combination approach to improve outcomes in this patient population (58,59,61). It will also be important to follow the significance of RET amplifications regarding response to RET inhibition for various cancers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in these patients the addition of crizotinib, a MET inhibitor, was sufficient to overcome this resistance and provide for response (47). The combination of RET inhibitors with a MET inhibitor or employing a TKI that targets both alterations may be beneficial in these patients (58)(59)(60).…”
Section: Ret and Resistance Mechanisms And Ret As Resistance Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melanoma patients with KIT amplification have been reported to derive clinical benefit from imatinib [13] and frequent copy number gains of KIT have been described in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung [14]. Furthermore, CDK4/6 amplifications have been associated with longer PFS in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors [15]. Finally, RICTOR amplification has been proposed as a mechanism of resistance to TKIs and potential therapeutic target in this setting [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, CDK4/6 amplifications have been associated with better outcome in breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. In lung cancer, recent in vitro research has suggested that the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with taxanes might be useful in SqCLC [15,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them are gene mutations that represent potential actionable targets (Figure 3). In detail, the loss of PTEN's exons 2-5 may predict sensitivity to mTOR inhibito [13], and CCND1 amplification may predict sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitors [14]. The an ysis also revealed an MDM2 amplification, a microsatellite status-stable profile and a lo mutational burden (3 muts/Mb); these results have been described to be associated with low rate of clinical benefit from immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors [1 Amplification FGF3 (fibroblast growth factor 3) Amplification FGF4 (fibroblast growth factor 4) Amplification In detail, the loss of PTEN's exons 2-5 may predict sensitivity to mTOR inhibitors [13], and CCND1 amplification may predict sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitors [14].…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%