2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-02044-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrowing of the remnant portal vein diameter and decreased portal vein angle are risk factors for portal vein thrombosis after perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The patient's AT-III level remained low. There is also literature indicating that narrowing of the remnant portal vein diameter and a decreased portal vein angle after major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are significant independent risk factors for postoperative PVT [20] . A postoperative portal vein angle of less than 90° (the angle of the PV was defined as follows: in right-sided hepatectomy and left-sided hemihepatectomy, the angle formed between the main PV and the first branch of the PV) and a diameter ratio of less than 45% (the diameter ratio was defined as the ratio of the remnant liver PV to the main PV diameter.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient's AT-III level remained low. There is also literature indicating that narrowing of the remnant portal vein diameter and a decreased portal vein angle after major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are significant independent risk factors for postoperative PVT [20] . A postoperative portal vein angle of less than 90° (the angle of the PV was defined as follows: in right-sided hepatectomy and left-sided hemihepatectomy, the angle formed between the main PV and the first branch of the PV) and a diameter ratio of less than 45% (the diameter ratio was defined as the ratio of the remnant liver PV to the main PV diameter.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the effect of the angulation of the SMV and SV on the hemodynamics in the portal system, the angulation varied from 80° to 120° and the other parameters were unchanged. The fixed velocities at SMV, SV, LGV and IMV inlets were set to be 13.87 cm/s, 18.30 cm/s, 8.00 cm/s and 7.80 cm/s, respectively [ 15 , 18 ]. The RPV and LPV outlets were fixed at 10 mmHg, and the vein walls were assumed to be rigid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the helicity of the helical flow in the portal vein which might be important to minimize the clinical risks of developing thrombus [ 15 ] and it was found to be strongly correlated with the angulation of superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and splenic vein (SV) [ 16 ], indicating that the relationship between PV structure and flow may be of clinical importance. In addition, several liver surgical studies found that the changes in angle of portal vein have an effect on PVT development [ 17 , 18 ]. However, up to now, whether the portal hemodynamics based on the anatomical structure can affect the PVT development in patients with cirrhosis has not yet determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that the geometry of the portal system plays an important role in portal hemodynamics and is therefore closely related to risk of PVT 12–14 . For example, the increase of PV diameter will directly lead to the decrease of PV blood flow velocity and WSS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that the geometry of the portal system plays an important role in portal hemodynamics and is therefore closely related to risk of PVT. [12][13][14] For example, the increase of PV diameter will directly lead to the decrease of PV blood flow velocity and WSS. In addition, a reduced angle between SV and SMV leads to a decrease in the spiral flow in the PV, which also increases PVT risk.Therefore,the morphological parameters of these portal systems can be used to rapidly assess PVT risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%