Abstract:BACKGROUND:Patients with firearm injuries are at high risk of subsequent arrest and injury following hospital discharge. We sought to evaluate the effect of a 6-month joint hospital-and community-based low-intensity intervention on risk of arrest and injury among patients with firearm injuries.
METHODS:We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial, enrolling patients with firearm injuries who received treatment at Harborview Medical Center, the level 1 trauma center in Seattle, Washington, were 18 years o… Show more
“…This was a qualitative study utilizing a semistructured interview format. Participants were adults ages 18 or older who were treated for an assault-related or unintentional firearm injury at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, WA and enrolled in the Helping Individuals with Firearm Injuries (HIFI) study (Lyons et al, 2021). HIFI was a randomized controlled trial of a 6-month intervention program among victims of firearm assault and unintentional injury to address their goals and link them to community services (i.e., housing, health, substance abuse treatment, employment) with the primary aims of reducing incarceration and violence recidivism.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are some overlapping risk factors for assault and unintentional firearm injuries, there are likely some differences between these groups. Some of the participants were enrolled in the intervention arm of the original trial, which found no differences in outcomes of interest including incarceration and repeat violence after injury (Lyons et al, 2021). Given these findings, the small number of participants, and qualitative nature of the study, it is difficult to identify discernable and meaningful differences between these groups.…”
Qualitative exploration into the risk, experiences, and outcomes of victims of firearm injury is imperative to informing not only further research, but prevention and intervention strategies. The purpose of this study was to explore prior violent exposures, risks, recovery, supportive services, outcomes, and views of firearms and violence among survivors of firearm assaults and unintentional injuries. Adults treated at a level 1 trauma center in Seattle, WA, for assault and unintentional firearm injuries were interviewed utilizing a semistructured instrument. Interview responses were coded to identify common themes and representative quotes are reported. Sixteen participants were interviewed. Notable themes included the following: (a) prior violent exposures were experienced by half of survivors, mostly through community violence; (b) risk for firearm injury was felt to be related to general societal violence, unsafe communities, and firearm practices; (c) important aspects of recovery included family/social support, mental health care and financial support services; (d) notable outcomes included psychological problems such as PTSD and anxiety, changes in relationships, and developing a new sense of purpose or mission in life; (e) generally negative views toward firearms, supporting restricted access and firearm safety practices; (f) acknowledgement of the complexity of firearm violence in society with prevention geared toward equitable education, economic opportunities and safety net programs to reduce community violence; and (g) disappointment in the criminal justice system. These findings demonstrate the varied experiences, needs, and outcomes after injury, but highlight the significance of community and societal violence, and need for improved mental health services. Integration of mental health services and victim assistance programs into trauma centers and hospital-based violence intervention programs is imperative for all survivors. Encouraging survivors to engage in new aspirations after injury can be empowering, and there is an unmet need for victim support and advocacy within the criminal justice system.
“…This was a qualitative study utilizing a semistructured interview format. Participants were adults ages 18 or older who were treated for an assault-related or unintentional firearm injury at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, WA and enrolled in the Helping Individuals with Firearm Injuries (HIFI) study (Lyons et al, 2021). HIFI was a randomized controlled trial of a 6-month intervention program among victims of firearm assault and unintentional injury to address their goals and link them to community services (i.e., housing, health, substance abuse treatment, employment) with the primary aims of reducing incarceration and violence recidivism.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are some overlapping risk factors for assault and unintentional firearm injuries, there are likely some differences between these groups. Some of the participants were enrolled in the intervention arm of the original trial, which found no differences in outcomes of interest including incarceration and repeat violence after injury (Lyons et al, 2021). Given these findings, the small number of participants, and qualitative nature of the study, it is difficult to identify discernable and meaningful differences between these groups.…”
Qualitative exploration into the risk, experiences, and outcomes of victims of firearm injury is imperative to informing not only further research, but prevention and intervention strategies. The purpose of this study was to explore prior violent exposures, risks, recovery, supportive services, outcomes, and views of firearms and violence among survivors of firearm assaults and unintentional injuries. Adults treated at a level 1 trauma center in Seattle, WA, for assault and unintentional firearm injuries were interviewed utilizing a semistructured instrument. Interview responses were coded to identify common themes and representative quotes are reported. Sixteen participants were interviewed. Notable themes included the following: (a) prior violent exposures were experienced by half of survivors, mostly through community violence; (b) risk for firearm injury was felt to be related to general societal violence, unsafe communities, and firearm practices; (c) important aspects of recovery included family/social support, mental health care and financial support services; (d) notable outcomes included psychological problems such as PTSD and anxiety, changes in relationships, and developing a new sense of purpose or mission in life; (e) generally negative views toward firearms, supporting restricted access and firearm safety practices; (f) acknowledgement of the complexity of firearm violence in society with prevention geared toward equitable education, economic opportunities and safety net programs to reduce community violence; and (g) disappointment in the criminal justice system. These findings demonstrate the varied experiences, needs, and outcomes after injury, but highlight the significance of community and societal violence, and need for improved mental health services. Integration of mental health services and victim assistance programs into trauma centers and hospital-based violence intervention programs is imperative for all survivors. Encouraging survivors to engage in new aspirations after injury can be empowering, and there is an unmet need for victim support and advocacy within the criminal justice system.
“…But we caution against generalizing the findings to other, less-intensive HVIP models and to most individuals who suffer serious injuries due to violence. Lyons et al (2021) conducted an RCT of an HVIP that involved engagement with an intervention specialist at bedside, motivational interviewing (Stanhope et al 2016) by a support specialist to encourage risk-reducing behaviors, and a case management approach-critical time intervention (Center for the Advancement of Critical Time Intervention 2016)-adapted specifically for individuals surviving gunshot wounds. The support specialist was a master's-trained social worker person of color who was provided guidance for assisting gunshot survivors from a multidisciplinary group of individuals consisting of local community organizations, a community mental health agency, law enforcement, and other public service agencies.…”
Section: Findings From Randomized Controlled Trials (Rcts)mentioning
We conducted a review of studies on the effects of hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIPs) on subsequent involvement in violence as a victim or perpetrator that included a nontreated control group. We identified seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six observational studies. Most HVIPs evaluated relied principally on credible messengers to engage potential participants and intensive case management to provide social services. Evidence of linkage of HVIPs to community violence intervention programs was lacking. RCTs of the most robust HVIPs showed some evidence of protective effects, but overall evidence of reduced risks for violence was mixed. RCTs were underpowered, and all but one were vulnerable to selection bias. Stronger interventions and research methods are needed to advance our understanding of the potential for HVIPs to reduce risks for future violence.
“…The study was conducted among patients presenting to Harborview Medical Center, a Level 1 trauma center in Seattle, Washington. The study is described in detail in Lyons et al ( 2020 ), Lyons et al ( 2021 ). The intervention goal was to support overall health and well-being, while the primary outcome was preventing arrest over two-years following hospital discharge, with a secondary outcome of preventing injury recidivism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Helping Individuals with Firearm Injuries (HiFi) study was launched to better understand the effectiveness of hospital-and community-based programs in reducing violence and subsequent injuries during and after recovery from gunshot wounds (GSWs) (Rowhani-Rahbar et al 2016;Lyons et al, 2021). The intervention was based on the Critical Time Intervention and included a phased intensity, with hospital and community-based interactions with the Support Specialist (Herman and Conover 2011;Tomita and Herman 2012).…”
Background
We discuss barriers to recruitment, retention, and intervention delivery in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of patients presenting with firearm injuries to a Level 1 trauma center. The intervention was adapted from the Critical Time Intervention and included a six-month period of support in the community after hospital discharge to address recovery goals. This study was one of the first RCTs of a hospital- and community-based intervention provided solely among patients with firearm injuries.
Main text
Barriers to recruitment included limited staffing, coupled with wide variability in length of stay and admission times, which made it difficult to predict the best time to recruit. At the same time, more acutely affected patients needed more time to stabilize in order to determine whether eligibility criteria were met. Barriers to retention included insufficient patient resources for stable housing, communication and transportation, as well as limited time for patients to meet with study staff to respond to follow-up surveys. These barriers similarly affected intervention delivery as patients who were recruited, but had fewer resources to help with recovery, had lower intervention engagement. These barriers fall within the broader context of system avoidance (e.g., avoiding institutions that keep formal records). Since the patient sample was racially diverse with the majority of patients having prior criminal justice system involvement, this may have precluded active participation from some patients, especially those from communities that have been subject to long and sustained history of trauma and racism. We discuss approaches to overcoming these barriers and the importance of such efforts to further implement and evaluate hospital-based violence intervention programs in the future.
Conclusion
Developing strategies to overcome barriers to data collection and ongoing participant contact are essential to gathering robust information to understand how well violence prevention programs work and providing the best care possible for people recovering from injuries.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.govNCT02630225. Registered 12/15/2015.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.