Abstract:Background Recently published paediatric guidelines for diagnosing coeliac disease do not include recommendations on the follow-up of coeliac disease patients.Goal The aim of this study was to assess the management practices and experience of coeliac disease patients with their follow-up appointments in Central Europe. Study Gastroenterologists and coeliac disease patients in five Central European countries were asked to complete the webbased questionnaire focusing on coeliac disease management practices. Resu… Show more
“…In Western countries, the recognition of silent or mild, atypical cases has improved a lot, but it is still not optimal [ 2 ]. In Hungary, the conditions for adequate diagnostics are given; however, similarly to other middle-European countries, access to dietary counseling and follow-up should be improved [ 53 ]. In our academic center, we founded a regional center for CeD care 20 years ago.…”
International trends indicate that celiac disease (CeD) is becoming more common, while the clinical presentation of CeD tends to change. We aimed to investigate factors associated with the clinical presentation of CeD. We reviewed all CeD cases diagnosed at our tertiary center, University of Pécs (Hungary), between 1992 and 2019. We collected data of verified CeD patients on clinical presentations (classified by the Oslo Classification), the age at and calendar year of diagnosis, and sex, serology and histology at diagnosis. To assess the associations of baseline variables with clinical presentations, we applied univariate and multivariate (binary logistic regression) statistics. A total of 738 CeD patients were eligible for inclusion. In the univariate analysis, patients with classical CeD were more common in the latest calendar period (p < 0.001) and tended to be older (p = 0.056), but we failed to observe a significant association between the clinical presentation and sex, serology or histology at diagnosis. In the multivariate analysis, only age at diagnosis and calendar year were independently associated with clinical presentations (OR = 1.02, CI: 1.01–1.04 and OR = 0.93, CI: 0.89–0.98, respectively). Our findings confirmed that classical CeD is independently associated with age at diagnosis and calendar year of diagnosis of CeD, whereas other parameters were not significantly associated with clinical presentations.
“…In Western countries, the recognition of silent or mild, atypical cases has improved a lot, but it is still not optimal [ 2 ]. In Hungary, the conditions for adequate diagnostics are given; however, similarly to other middle-European countries, access to dietary counseling and follow-up should be improved [ 53 ]. In our academic center, we founded a regional center for CeD care 20 years ago.…”
International trends indicate that celiac disease (CeD) is becoming more common, while the clinical presentation of CeD tends to change. We aimed to investigate factors associated with the clinical presentation of CeD. We reviewed all CeD cases diagnosed at our tertiary center, University of Pécs (Hungary), between 1992 and 2019. We collected data of verified CeD patients on clinical presentations (classified by the Oslo Classification), the age at and calendar year of diagnosis, and sex, serology and histology at diagnosis. To assess the associations of baseline variables with clinical presentations, we applied univariate and multivariate (binary logistic regression) statistics. A total of 738 CeD patients were eligible for inclusion. In the univariate analysis, patients with classical CeD were more common in the latest calendar period (p < 0.001) and tended to be older (p = 0.056), but we failed to observe a significant association between the clinical presentation and sex, serology or histology at diagnosis. In the multivariate analysis, only age at diagnosis and calendar year were independently associated with clinical presentations (OR = 1.02, CI: 1.01–1.04 and OR = 0.93, CI: 0.89–0.98, respectively). Our findings confirmed that classical CeD is independently associated with age at diagnosis and calendar year of diagnosis of CeD, whereas other parameters were not significantly associated with clinical presentations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.