2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-020-01215-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

College Student Perspectives of Telemental Health: a Review of the Recent Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
62
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(52 reference statements)
3
62
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the low experience rates regarding digi-MHSs in our sample (5%) correspond to earlier surveys from Germany (Webelhorst et al, 2020;Breil et al, 2021) and international findings across different populations (Toscos et al, 2018;Clough et al, 2019;Richardson et al, 2020). Although research has revealed positive attitudes and the readiness to try stand-alone digi-MHSs among university students (Hadler et al, 2021), in direct comparison face-to-face support, including blended care, have been shown to be preferred in surveys, including discrete choice experiments (Phillips et al, 2021). Future experiments on acceptance-facilitating interventions may therefore extend the scope to blended interventions.…”
Section: Rq2: Differences In Acceptancesupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the low experience rates regarding digi-MHSs in our sample (5%) correspond to earlier surveys from Germany (Webelhorst et al, 2020;Breil et al, 2021) and international findings across different populations (Toscos et al, 2018;Clough et al, 2019;Richardson et al, 2020). Although research has revealed positive attitudes and the readiness to try stand-alone digi-MHSs among university students (Hadler et al, 2021), in direct comparison face-to-face support, including blended care, have been shown to be preferred in surveys, including discrete choice experiments (Phillips et al, 2021). Future experiments on acceptance-facilitating interventions may therefore extend the scope to blended interventions.…”
Section: Rq2: Differences In Acceptancesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Interestingly, research indicated a higher acceptance of digi-MHSs among university students with personal use experience, but the utilization rates of existing digital interventions remain very low (Dunbar et al, 2018;Hadler et al, 2021;Lavergne and Kennedy, 2021). Potentially, suitable digi-MHSs are yet not well known and thus seldom used by university students despite overall positive attitudes (Mayer et al, 2019;Apolinário-Hagen et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…academic, social, mental health, financial), in order to offer the appropriate support. Given the limitations of still ongoing COVID-19 containment measures, and a presumable affinity for internet use, coordinated online support could be a suitable way to reduce loneliness among university students and their risk of mental disorders 37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…academic, social, mental health, financial), in order to offer the appropriate support. Given the limitations by on-going COVID-19 containment measures, and a presumable affinity for internet use, coordinated online support could be a suitable way to reduce loneliness among university students and their risk of mental disorders 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%