2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03827-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of biological mesh reconstruction versus primary perineal closure after abdominoperineal excision of rectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it may further decrease the local recurrence rate and improve survival (18). Biological mesh was applied to reduce perineal hernia, perineal wound complications and post-operative radiation pelvic disease (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it may further decrease the local recurrence rate and improve survival (18). Biological mesh was applied to reduce perineal hernia, perineal wound complications and post-operative radiation pelvic disease (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 1 year, the incidence of perineal hernia was significantly high after primary closure of the perineal wounds (odds ratio, 0.400; 95% CI, 0.240–0.665; P = 0.001). Both studies found that the perineal hernia rate was significantly lower in biologic mesh reconstruction as compared to primary closure and the operation time and hospital stay were shorter after primary perineal closure [ 125 , 126 ]. Other studies have shown a lower incidence of surgical site infection using prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy to prevent wound-related complications in surgery, with a risk reduction of about 25% to 30% [ 127 ].…”
Section: Surgical Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%