2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2020.153354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning approaches for crop improvement: Leveraging phenotypic and genotypic big data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Query population The training population is used to calibrate (d) ML models that aim using genomic information to predict genomic estimated adaptive values (GEAVs, an analogous rank to the polygenic risk score (PGS) and genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) from the quantitative genomics literature, e.g., [102,136]). The computer screen depicts a hypothetical hidden neural network (HNN) algorithm, which is one among many potential ML tools; the repertoire includes several regressions, classification, and deep learning models, thoughtfully reviewed this year by Sebestyén et al [137] and Tong and Nikoloski [138]. Meanwhile, the testing population is used to compute the (e) unbiased predictive ability of the model by comparing the GEAVs with the recorded environmental (or phenotypic) abiotic stress tolerant/susceptible indices.…”
Section: Geavs Geavsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Query population The training population is used to calibrate (d) ML models that aim using genomic information to predict genomic estimated adaptive values (GEAVs, an analogous rank to the polygenic risk score (PGS) and genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) from the quantitative genomics literature, e.g., [102,136]). The computer screen depicts a hypothetical hidden neural network (HNN) algorithm, which is one among many potential ML tools; the repertoire includes several regressions, classification, and deep learning models, thoughtfully reviewed this year by Sebestyén et al [137] and Tong and Nikoloski [138]. Meanwhile, the testing population is used to compute the (e) unbiased predictive ability of the model by comparing the GEAVs with the recorded environmental (or phenotypic) abiotic stress tolerant/susceptible indices.…”
Section: Geavs Geavsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since SNPs represent the most abundant form of allelic variations [2], they represent the predominant factor that induces phenotypic differences among individuals. Usage of SNPs with modern machine-learning approaches have revolutionized molecular plant breeding, both with respect to applied research in prediction of traits and basic research in the mechanisms governing a trait [3][4][5]. Hence, characterising the effects of SNPs on agronomically relevant traits is a key problem in the interlinked fields of plant systems biology, quantitative genetics, and plant breeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently [19] addressed a machine learning approach for crop improvement by leveraging phenotypic and genotypic big data to predict agricultural production based on phenotypic traits used in genomic selection in breeding. Furthermore, [20] reviewed the latest studies on machine learning in the field of plant breeding and biotechnology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%