2021
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning slow Mohs excision margins for lentigo maligna: a retrospective nonrandomized cohort study comparing reflectance confocal microscopy margin mapping vs. visual inspection with dermoscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might indicate a beneficial effect of presurgical mapping by HH‐RCM combined with any surgical technique. Nonetheless, these data should be considered with some caution, as one single comparative study by Gao et al, 35 could not demonstrate a significant reduction in necessary surgical stages. Even so, HH‐RCM did allow for better presurgical planning with a significant reduction in time to closure, and significant results might be achieved by larger adequate comparative studies and increased experience of the HH‐RCM user.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This might indicate a beneficial effect of presurgical mapping by HH‐RCM combined with any surgical technique. Nonetheless, these data should be considered with some caution, as one single comparative study by Gao et al, 35 could not demonstrate a significant reduction in necessary surgical stages. Even so, HH‐RCM did allow for better presurgical planning with a significant reduction in time to closure, and significant results might be achieved by larger adequate comparative studies and increased experience of the HH‐RCM user.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Negative histological margins were obtained after the first stage in 86% (89/103) using HH‐RCM prior to SE, 58,67 compared with 50% (217/433) without HH‐RCM 47,53,57,61,66,68 ( p < 0.0001). For MMS‐treated patients ( n = 894) the weighted mean ± SD (range) stages for histological clearance was 1.6 ± 0.3 (1.4–2.3), 34,35,37,40,43,69–71 compared to 1.3 with HH‐RCM mapping prior to MMS ( n = 21) 35 ( p < 0.001). Negative histological margins were obtained after the first stage in 81% (17/21) using HH‐RCM prior to MMS, 35 compared with 77% (1333/1723) without HH‐RCM 35,36,43,59,70,72 ( p = 0.69).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations