The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2020.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudio piloto de la teledermatología directa durante el estado de alarma por la pandemia COVID-19 en un área sanitaria de Madrid (Estudio EVIDE-19)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the store-and-forward model of dermatologic care, patients may submit subpar photographs that render making a diagnosis almost impossible. In Madrid, a pilot study to analyze the viability of TD during the pandemic found that only 52.1% of all submitted images were of sufficient quality, and in approximately 10% of cases, a diagnosis could not be rendered either because the image quality was poor or because the submitted image did not pertain to the chief complaint [ 22 ]. In another study to evaluate patient attitudes towards the technical experience of synchronous TD during COVID-19, Pearlman et al encountered the same problem, noting that about one in three patients reported that their dermatologist was only able to see their skin to a ‘poor’ or ‘acceptable’ degree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the store-and-forward model of dermatologic care, patients may submit subpar photographs that render making a diagnosis almost impossible. In Madrid, a pilot study to analyze the viability of TD during the pandemic found that only 52.1% of all submitted images were of sufficient quality, and in approximately 10% of cases, a diagnosis could not be rendered either because the image quality was poor or because the submitted image did not pertain to the chief complaint [ 22 ]. In another study to evaluate patient attitudes towards the technical experience of synchronous TD during COVID-19, Pearlman et al encountered the same problem, noting that about one in three patients reported that their dermatologist was only able to see their skin to a ‘poor’ or ‘acceptable’ degree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%