“…In the store-and-forward model of dermatologic care, patients may submit subpar photographs that render making a diagnosis almost impossible. In Madrid, a pilot study to analyze the viability of TD during the pandemic found that only 52.1% of all submitted images were of sufficient quality, and in approximately 10% of cases, a diagnosis could not be rendered either because the image quality was poor or because the submitted image did not pertain to the chief complaint [ 22 ]. In another study to evaluate patient attitudes towards the technical experience of synchronous TD during COVID-19, Pearlman et al encountered the same problem, noting that about one in three patients reported that their dermatologist was only able to see their skin to a ‘poor’ or ‘acceptable’ degree.…”
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has fundamentally transformed the landscape of providing dermatologic care. In an age of lockdowns and social distancing, teledermatology (TD) has emerged as a powerful tool to deliver remote care. Here, we review literature on TD use during the pandemic to evaluate the positives and negatives of TD implementation. We especially consider the reception of TD in underserved communities and the developing world as well as the ethico-legal challenges wrought by the burgeoning utilization of this new paradigm of care. The potential of TD to occupy a more prominent role in dermatologic care in a post-COVID-19 world is also discussed.
“…In the store-and-forward model of dermatologic care, patients may submit subpar photographs that render making a diagnosis almost impossible. In Madrid, a pilot study to analyze the viability of TD during the pandemic found that only 52.1% of all submitted images were of sufficient quality, and in approximately 10% of cases, a diagnosis could not be rendered either because the image quality was poor or because the submitted image did not pertain to the chief complaint [ 22 ]. In another study to evaluate patient attitudes towards the technical experience of synchronous TD during COVID-19, Pearlman et al encountered the same problem, noting that about one in three patients reported that their dermatologist was only able to see their skin to a ‘poor’ or ‘acceptable’ degree.…”
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has fundamentally transformed the landscape of providing dermatologic care. In an age of lockdowns and social distancing, teledermatology (TD) has emerged as a powerful tool to deliver remote care. Here, we review literature on TD use during the pandemic to evaluate the positives and negatives of TD implementation. We especially consider the reception of TD in underserved communities and the developing world as well as the ethico-legal challenges wrought by the burgeoning utilization of this new paradigm of care. The potential of TD to occupy a more prominent role in dermatologic care in a post-COVID-19 world is also discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.