2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prognostic significance of anaplasia in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“… [ 35 ] 18 F (≤ 31) j KDM6A , c.1846dupA, p.Thr616Asnfs*5 NO Endometrial cancer NA NA ≤5% of endometrial cancer diagnosed in women ≤ 40 years NA [ 4 ] B-ALL B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, BAP break-apart probe, BCL B-cell lymphoma, BM bone marrow, CD cluster of differentiation, CGH comparative genomic hybridization, CHARGE syndrome/MIM#214800 coloboma, heart defects, choanal atresia, retardation of growth/development, genital- and ear abnormalities, CNV copy number variation, COSMIC catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer, EBNA-2 Epstein-Barr nuclear-antigen 2, EBV Epstein-Barr virus, EMA epithelial membrane antigen, FISH fluorescence in situ hybridization, GFAP glial fibrillary acidic protein, GL germline, Het heterozygous, ISH in situ hybridization, Ki-67 Kiel clone 67, M months, Myf4 myogenin, MYOD1 myogenic differentiation 1, NA not analyzed/available Neg negative, NR not reported, OC Oral contraceptive, Pt patient, SMA smooth muscle actin, SOM reported as somatic variant in COSMIC database, TdT terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase, T-ALL T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, WHO World Health Organization, Yr year a Patients S1 with Burkitt lymphoma with insufficient clinical information regarding Kabuki syndrome is not present in this table but is included in Supporting Table S4 b Clinical diagnosis based on assessment of clinical features presented in the individual manuscripts by the author’s of the present study, see the “supplementary materials and methods” section c Diagnosis, clinico- and histopathologic features as provided in the original manuscript. These may not fulfil the present WHO-criteria for the respective tumors d References for common/general (clinical) presentation of individual tumor entities in Supporting data e Includes (other)potential predisposing (genetic) factors for the reported malignancy f Morphology does not show anaplastic features suggestive of a TP53 germline variant [ 143 , 144 ] g Initial tumor diagnosed as spindle cell hemangioma, 2nd tumor at same site as giant cell fibroblastoma h Diagnosed by long-distance polymerase chain reaction (PCR) i Karyotype at time of tumor diagnosis (peripheral blood) j Age at last examination …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… [ 35 ] 18 F (≤ 31) j KDM6A , c.1846dupA, p.Thr616Asnfs*5 NO Endometrial cancer NA NA ≤5% of endometrial cancer diagnosed in women ≤ 40 years NA [ 4 ] B-ALL B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, BAP break-apart probe, BCL B-cell lymphoma, BM bone marrow, CD cluster of differentiation, CGH comparative genomic hybridization, CHARGE syndrome/MIM#214800 coloboma, heart defects, choanal atresia, retardation of growth/development, genital- and ear abnormalities, CNV copy number variation, COSMIC catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer, EBNA-2 Epstein-Barr nuclear-antigen 2, EBV Epstein-Barr virus, EMA epithelial membrane antigen, FISH fluorescence in situ hybridization, GFAP glial fibrillary acidic protein, GL germline, Het heterozygous, ISH in situ hybridization, Ki-67 Kiel clone 67, M months, Myf4 myogenin, MYOD1 myogenic differentiation 1, NA not analyzed/available Neg negative, NR not reported, OC Oral contraceptive, Pt patient, SMA smooth muscle actin, SOM reported as somatic variant in COSMIC database, TdT terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase, T-ALL T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, WHO World Health Organization, Yr year a Patients S1 with Burkitt lymphoma with insufficient clinical information regarding Kabuki syndrome is not present in this table but is included in Supporting Table S4 b Clinical diagnosis based on assessment of clinical features presented in the individual manuscripts by the author’s of the present study, see the “supplementary materials and methods” section c Diagnosis, clinico- and histopathologic features as provided in the original manuscript. These may not fulfil the present WHO-criteria for the respective tumors d References for common/general (clinical) presentation of individual tumor entities in Supporting data e Includes (other)potential predisposing (genetic) factors for the reported malignancy f Morphology does not show anaplastic features suggestive of a TP53 germline variant [ 143 , 144 ] g Initial tumor diagnosed as spindle cell hemangioma, 2nd tumor at same site as giant cell fibroblastoma h Diagnosed by long-distance polymerase chain reaction (PCR) i Karyotype at time of tumor diagnosis (peripheral blood) j Age at last examination …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our CNNs accurately identified the most prognostically relevant genomic alterations in RMS ( PAX3/7–FOXO1 fusion and mutations in MYOD1 , TP53 ). TP53 mutations are present at diagnosis in 5% to 15% of patients with FN-RMS ( 14–16 ) and although anaplasia is associated with TP53 mutations in other tumors, only 60% to 70% of TP53 -mutant RMS display focal or diffuse anaplasia ( 32, 35 ). Moreover, only 24% of anaplastic RMS contains a TP53 mutation ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TP53 mutations are present at diagnosis in 5% to 15% of patients with FN-RMS ( 14–16 ) and although anaplasia is associated with TP53 mutations in other tumors, only 60% to 70% of TP53 -mutant RMS display focal or diffuse anaplasia ( 32, 35 ). Moreover, only 24% of anaplastic RMS contains a TP53 mutation ( 32 ). Beyond histologic variability, intratumoral genetic heterogeneity may also be confounding as recently acquired TP53 mutations may be nonuniformly distributed within the tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, there are histologic features, beyond alveolar vs. embryonal, that have been assessed for their prognostic significance, in particular, the presence of anaplasia. Anaplasia is a histologic phenomenon that is associated with worse outcomes in other childhood cancers, such as Wilms tumor [125], and has been appreciated in cases of ERMS more commonly than in any other subtype of RMS [9]. Recent data suggest that anaplasia in RMS is not an independent adverse prognostic factor, with the caveat that larger studies may be necessary to confirm this finding [126].…”
Section: Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%