Is ibuprofen superior to indomethacin for patent ductus arteriosus in Japanese preterm infants?

Abstract

Background Many clinical trials have indicated that ibuprofen (IBU) has similar effects to indomethacin (IND) on the closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with fewer adverse effects. Owing to the scarce evidence on IBU use in Japan because of its recent approval we performed this observational study to compare the efficacy and safety of IBU with the efficiency and safety of IND. Methods We included infants (gestational age < 30 weeks) with hemodynamically significant PDA under a prophylactic IND protocol for intraventricular hemorrhage who were treated with either IND (n = 30) or IBU (n = 30). We compared a PDA closing effect, changes in ultrasonography findings, and adverse effects between the groups. Results There was no significant difference in the rates of PDA closure in the first treatment course (IND vs IBU: 46.7% vs 50.0%, P = 0.796) and surgical closure (IND vs IBU: 20.0% vs 20.0%, P = 1.000) between the groups. Both groups showed significant oliguria (IND vs IBU: 30.0% vs 23.3%, P = 0.559) and increased serum creatinine levels after treatment. However, an increase in serum creatinine level by >0.3 mg/dL, a criterion for acute kidney injury, was less frequent in the IBU group (35.7%) compared with that in the IND group (84.2%, P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in echocardiographic changes and jaundice and hypoglycemia incidence rates between the groups. Conclusions Except for an increase in serum creatinine levels by >0.3 mg/dL, which was less frequent with IBU, IBU had similar efficacy and safety as IND for preterm PDA. Ibuprofen and IND should be cautiously administered.