2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in a clinical measure of cervical movement sense following four weeks of kinematic training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, acuity tasks should either standardize the movement speed or as performed in this study (NormAcuity) , normalize acuity to movement time in the analyses for better discriminative ability between neck pain groups and healthy controls. In a similar way, the sum of the number of errors and time taken has been suggested as a possible solution to account for this when using human analysis of the test ( 15 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, acuity tasks should either standardize the movement speed or as performed in this study (NormAcuity) , normalize acuity to movement time in the analyses for better discriminative ability between neck pain groups and healthy controls. In a similar way, the sum of the number of errors and time taken has been suggested as a possible solution to account for this when using human analysis of the test ( 15 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measures are able to determine differences between individuals with neck pain and healthy participants ( 14 ). It was also found that the test demonstrates a clinically meaningful change in response to training ( 15 ) and the examiner's ratings of error and time taken were reliable (intra- and inter-tester) ( 16 ). These findings support the feasibility of these tracing tests for use in clinical practice ( 16 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The smaller difference in amplitude with the “Fly” method is concordant with the smaller geometry in the setup on a PC screen in comparison to the present setup on the wall in a 1 × 1 m geometry. The “cervical movement sense” test 9 yields numbers of errors during the tracking but no measures in mm nor was the speed of tracking preset. In conclusion, by a qualitative comparison, all three methods indicate impaired motor control of the neck muscles in the studied conditions of chronic muscular neck pain and tenderness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronic whiplash and tension‐type headache were studied together since these conditions are clinically similar by having chronic muscular pain and tenderness in the neck. Previous studies have indicated dyscoordination of head movements in whiplash and in chronic neck pain conditions as measured by various methods such as “Fastrak” and the “Fly” 1‐7 and reviewed by Hesby et al 8 Recently, an additional “clinical cervical movement sense” test involving head laser tracking of a “ZZ” like figure was used to measure head movements in chronic neck pain and monitor a possible effect of training 9 . While it appears that each of these methods may have good reliability within the local settings of the respective studies, these methods are not easily standardizable nor transferable for comparison in other clinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%