The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.2340/00015555-3711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Sex in Systemic Psoriasis Therapy: Differences in Prescription, Effectiveness and Safety in the BIOBADADERM Prospective Cohort

Abstract: The effect of sex on systemic therapy for psoriasis has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to determine, in a large group of 2,881 patients followed from January 2008 to November 2018, whether sex influences prescription, effectiveness of therapy, or the risk of adverse events. The results show that women were more likely than men to be prescribed systemic therapy. No differences between men and women were found in the effectiveness of therapy. Women were also more likely to experience adverse ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This latter observation is also in line with the literature. 24 We hypothesize that this may be related to the reported lower satisfaction with treatment among women with psoriasis, 6 , 10 which is confirmed by our results, showing at enrolment significantly lower scores among women for all TSQM-9 domains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This latter observation is also in line with the literature. 24 We hypothesize that this may be related to the reported lower satisfaction with treatment among women with psoriasis, 6 , 10 which is confirmed by our results, showing at enrolment significantly lower scores among women for all TSQM-9 domains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Twice as many women as men were treated with systemic drugs other than biologics, in line with previous data, showing that women are more likely than men to be prescribed biologics and overall systemic therapy. 24 Although there were no relevant differences in the duration of illness, more women than men had been previously treated with biologics (50% vs. 47%) and women had also received more previous biological treatment lines. This latter observation is also in line with the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“… 101 In a Spanish registry study, however, treatment effectiveness of systemic treatment was similar in women and men. 100 Regarding side effects, women were more likely to experience acute infections during treatment with biologic drugs in an Italian study ( n = 167, 63.4% men) and more side effects in a Spanish study ( n = 2881, 58.3% men) when treated with a systemic agent. 100 , 102 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 58 Contrarily to this, in a Spanish cohort study ( n = 2881; 58.3% men), women had a 33% higher chance of being prescribed a modern therapeutic agent. 100 In a 2-country, multicenter, prospective, noninterventional registry study ( n = 5346, 67.3% male) evaluating gender differences regarding systemic antipsoriatic treatment, women had a higher PASI response and were more likely to achieve a DLQI reduction of ≥4. 101 In a Spanish registry study, however, treatment effectiveness of systemic treatment was similar in women and men.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, patient subgroups were prespecified a priori in the protocol and defined according to seven clinically relevant demographic and disease variables with binary categories: (i) sex (male or female) [11,[18][19][20], (ii) age (\ 65 or C 65 years) [13,14], (iii) body mass index (BMI [B 30 or [ 30 kg/m 2 ]) [19][20][21], (iv) race (White or Asian) [4,[22][23][24][25], (v) PsO disease duration (\ 15 or C 15 years) [13,20], (vi) PsA comorbidity (present or absent) [13,20,26], and (vii) prior biologic use (never or C 1) [8,20,27,28]. Across all subgroup categories, pairwise effectiveness comparisons were completed for the anti-IL-17A cohort versus the other biologics cohort and for IXE versus the other individual biologics.…”
Section: Study Design and Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%