The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying anthropogenic threats affecting Marine Protected Areas in developing countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used georeferenced data to calculate the distance from the boundary of the MKGR and identify hotspots of illicit grazing in the MKGR using ArcGIS and QGIS 10.8 and 3.18, respectively. We visualized the hotspots of illegal grazing by plotting four heat maps with Kernel density for years 1990-1998, 2000-2003, 2006-2014 for TAWIRI'S survey data and the years 2017-2019 based on ranger reports [25]. The distance from the boundary of the MKGR was calculated using the ArcGIS nearest distance tool to determine how far the livestock entered into the reserve over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used georeferenced data to calculate the distance from the boundary of the MKGR and identify hotspots of illicit grazing in the MKGR using ArcGIS and QGIS 10.8 and 3.18, respectively. We visualized the hotspots of illegal grazing by plotting four heat maps with Kernel density for years 1990-1998, 2000-2003, 2006-2014 for TAWIRI'S survey data and the years 2017-2019 based on ranger reports [25]. The distance from the boundary of the MKGR was calculated using the ArcGIS nearest distance tool to determine how far the livestock entered into the reserve over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for entering into PAs with livestock have repeatedly been named as lenient penalties for illegal grazing compared to other wildlife offences [17], the demand of foraging resources inside PAs, which are not found elsewhere [21], a limited benefit that communities receive from wildlife resources [22,23], owning large numbers of livestock [21] and limited anti-poaching efforts in relation to the size and challenge of the PAs [17,24]. Studying the combination of illegal activities such as illegal fishing, grazing, logging, wildlife poaching and wildlife snaring prevents a deeper understanding of their driving cause, especially grazing activities, and hinders suitable developing approaches towards interventions [17,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation suggests that nonlethal incidents, possibly influenced by intrinsic factors, have become more prevalent, indirectly indicating a decline in the overall health status of the population. Unfortunately, the population’s predicament seems to be exacerbated by the development of the surrounding urban area (Figure D), leading to an escalation of the TI. The marine environment of the PRE faces substantial pollution from agricultural and industrial contaminants . Stranded dolphins reveal high levels of various pollutants, with EDC levels notably elevated on a global scale. ,,, EDC contaminants are identified as one of the most critical stressors contributing to the decline of the PRE humpback dolphin population. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marine biodiversity is noted to be declining globally, partly due to climatic changes caused by anthropogenic activities (Bullock et al., 2021; Closek et al., 2019; de Oliveira Júnior et al., 2021). To protect marine environments, various entities are rooting for comprehensive biodiversity assessment initiatives to inform strategic management regimens (Cochrane et al., 2016; Lotze, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%