2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.07.619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

332 Genetic testing for cyp2c19*2 but not for pon-1 qq carrier status predicts high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To study the potential impact of platelet reactivity data missing from three studies totalling 1544 patients, a sensitivity analysis was performed with the following extreme hypotheses: the mean difference and standard deviation in platelet assay results between PON1‐192QQ and 192QQ + RR subjects in each missing study was set to the highest possible standardized mean difference, knowing that the differences were reported as statistically non‐significant in each of the three missing studies. Assuming that all differences were positive, this corresponded to standardized mean differences of 0.42 (0.00; 0.85), 0.32 (0.00; 0.63) and 0.11 (0.00; 0.22), for the studies of 88 [36], 157 [34] and 1299 patients [35], respectively. Following this extreme hypothesis, the pooled standardized mean difference would be 0.12 (−0.01; 0.25) ( P = 0.07).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To study the potential impact of platelet reactivity data missing from three studies totalling 1544 patients, a sensitivity analysis was performed with the following extreme hypotheses: the mean difference and standard deviation in platelet assay results between PON1‐192QQ and 192QQ + RR subjects in each missing study was set to the highest possible standardized mean difference, knowing that the differences were reported as statistically non‐significant in each of the three missing studies. Assuming that all differences were positive, this corresponded to standardized mean differences of 0.42 (0.00; 0.85), 0.32 (0.00; 0.63) and 0.11 (0.00; 0.22), for the studies of 88 [36], 157 [34] and 1299 patients [35], respectively. Following this extreme hypothesis, the pooled standardized mean difference would be 0.12 (−0.01; 0.25) ( P = 0.07).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. There were 11 449 patients enrolled in the 17 selected studies [12,[14][15][16][17][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], which were all published in 2011 or 2012, most data being derived from existing cohorts. Details of the 17 studies are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Selection and Characteristics Of The Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations