2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.09.936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Sternotomy on Physical Activity and Quality of Life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, there is a higher patient’s satisfaction for cosmetics in MIMVS due to the location and size of the incision ( Figure 1 ). Minimally invasive access showed improved quality of life and faster return to daily activity compared to sternotomy in the early postoperative phase (first 3 months) [ 24 , 25 ]. The results of the Mini-Mitral Trial in the United Kingdom will soon report their findings on differences in functional outcome (for example quality of life) in the first year after surgery [ 26 ].…”
Section: Benefits and Limitations Of Minimally Invasive Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there is a higher patient’s satisfaction for cosmetics in MIMVS due to the location and size of the incision ( Figure 1 ). Minimally invasive access showed improved quality of life and faster return to daily activity compared to sternotomy in the early postoperative phase (first 3 months) [ 24 , 25 ]. The results of the Mini-Mitral Trial in the United Kingdom will soon report their findings on differences in functional outcome (for example quality of life) in the first year after surgery [ 26 ].…”
Section: Benefits and Limitations Of Minimally Invasive Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, it could be hard to justify a traditional open surgical operation, not least because the risk/benefit threshold may be harder to meet ( Trevis et al, 2020 ). For example, conventional open surgeries, splitting the sternum (median sternotomy) or via the ribcage (thoracotomy), have been associated with a longer initial recovery and higher incidence of overall complications/adverse events than minimally invasive approaches ( Lim et al, 2021 ; Moscarelli et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery may be associated with a lower risk of surgical site complications and mortality, a similar need for reoperation, faster recovery, better functional outcomes, and higher patient satisfaction rates than conventional sternotomy. [28][29][30][31][32] However, although racial disparities in the use of minimally invasive surgery have been reported for noncardiac surgery, 33 disparities in utilization of and outcomes after minimally invasive approaches for mitral valve surgery have not been examined. Our primary goal was to examine racial and ethnic disparities in the utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%