2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational identification of preservatives with potential neuronal cytotoxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consensus chemical space was determined by using a decision tree-based method 12 , 13 ) to derive classification rules for the exclusion of chemicals outside of the consensus chemical space. To avoid overfitting problems, the determination of the consensus chemical space was derived solely from the training dataset and independently tested using the test dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The consensus chemical space was determined by using a decision tree-based method 12 , 13 ) to derive classification rules for the exclusion of chemicals outside of the consensus chemical space. To avoid overfitting problems, the determination of the consensus chemical space was derived solely from the training dataset and independently tested using the test dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 143 pesticides were randomly divided into a training dataset and a test dataset at a 2 : 1 ratio. Exclusion rules for chemicals outside of the consensus chemical space were derived by using a decision tree-based algorithm 12 , 13 ) with nine different fingerprints based on the training dataset, and their predictive performance was evaluated using the test dataset. The test result showed that the proposed method using standard fingerprints is effective in identifying non-sensitizers with a high concordance of 100%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority vote of outputs from all decision trees was applied to make the final prediction. Random forest is shown to be effective and robust for small datasets [41][42][43][44][45] and is considered suitable for this study. The percentage of stable prediction was utilized as the prediction score ranging from 1 (stable) to 0 (unstable).…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in that review, state‐of‐the‐art molecular toxicity‐based prioritization studies making use of, for example, the ToxCast database, were not discussed (see Hartman et al, 2018; Rogers et al, 2021). In addition, there have been no summaries or interpretations of several key prioritization studies employing novel screening approaches such as in vitro neuronal cytotoxicity and (anti‐)estrogenic activity published during 2018–2022 (see Pinto et al, 2019; Kan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%