The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.23736/s0392-9590.20.04498-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the relationship between death and CHA2DS2-VASc score in peripheral artery disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] Other recent studies have also demonstrated the prognostic value of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score in various cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases, for clinical outcomes beyond stroke such as death, major adverse cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalisations and cardiac hospitalisations. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Most of the patients in these studies have established cardiovascular diseases, are hospitalised and/ or undergoing cardiovascular procedures, whereas our study differs with having a large proportion of patients who are stable outpatients. Even so, the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was an important risk prognosticator in our lower risk population, and this comes as no surprise given that most of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc components are known cardiovascular risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3] Other recent studies have also demonstrated the prognostic value of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score in various cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases, for clinical outcomes beyond stroke such as death, major adverse cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalisations and cardiac hospitalisations. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Most of the patients in these studies have established cardiovascular diseases, are hospitalised and/ or undergoing cardiovascular procedures, whereas our study differs with having a large proportion of patients who are stable outpatients. Even so, the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was an important risk prognosticator in our lower risk population, and this comes as no surprise given that most of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc components are known cardiovascular risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[1][2][3] A number of contemporary studies have reported the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score to be associated with adverse clinical outcomes in a variety of cardiovascular diseases beyond AF, such as heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease and even non-cardiovascular disease like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and COVID-19 infection. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Whether the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score stratify mortality risk in both patients with AF and without AF (non-AF), regardless of the number of co-morbidities, is not well established, but important to investigate given recent interests in clinical electronic medical records (EMR) embedded calculator based risk prediction in general populations. Patients undergoing stress tests are a relatively low-risk cohort compared with those with established cardiovascular disease, and are often referred for risk stratification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, several studies [ 11 – 25 ] have investigated the predictive value of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score for clinical outcomes beyond stroke, such as death, heart failure hospitalizations and cardiac hospitalizations, in various cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases. In particular, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score has been strongly associated with major adverse cardiac outcomes in non-AF community populations [ 11 ] and in following categories of non-AF patients: patients discharged after an acute coronary syndrome and/or acute myocardial infarction [ 12 14 ]; patients who underwent cardiac surgery [ 15 ]; HF patients [ 16 18 ]; patients with arterial hypertension [ 19 ]; patients with peripheral artery disease [ 20 ]; ambulatory patients [ 21 , 22 ]; finally patients with COPD [ 23 , 24 ] and SARS-CoV-2 [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This score, developed by Lip GY et al [ 25 ] in 2010, is actually recommended for estimating thromboembolic risk and deciding on anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients [ 26 , 27 ]. In the last few years, the incremental prognostic role of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score has been demonstrated in several cardiovascular [ 28 33 ] and non-cardiovascular diseases [ 34 , 35 ], irrespective of AF presence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%