2014
DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2014)112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

331 models facing new b → sμ + μ − data

Abstract: Abstract:We investigate how the 331 models, based on the gauge group SU(3) C × SU(3) L ×U(1) X face new data on B s,d → µ + µ − and B d → K * (K)µ + µ − taking into account present constraints from ∆F = 2 observables, low energy precision measurements, LEP-II and the LHC data. In these models new sources of flavour and CP violation originate dominantly through flavour violating interactions of ordinary quarks and leptons with a new heavy Z gauge boson. The strength of the relevant couplings is governed by four… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
243
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(346 reference statements)
9
243
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several later studies have reached similar conclusions from B → K * µ + µ − data, using different observables [8] and/or statistical methods [9], with possible interpretations in terms of Z models 1 [7,8,[18][19][20][21]. Interestingly, a recent lattice study of B → K * µ + µ − and B s → φµ + µ − form factors [22,23] confirms the same trend using different observables (branching ratios rather than angular observables) and in a different kinematic regime (low rather than large hadronic recoil).…”
Section: Jhep12(2014)125mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Several later studies have reached similar conclusions from B → K * µ + µ − data, using different observables [8] and/or statistical methods [9], with possible interpretations in terms of Z models 1 [7,8,[18][19][20][21]. Interestingly, a recent lattice study of B → K * µ + µ − and B s → φµ + µ − form factors [22,23] confirms the same trend using different observables (branching ratios rather than angular observables) and in a different kinematic regime (low rather than large hadronic recoil).…”
Section: Jhep12(2014)125mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Models featuring extra Z to explain the anomalies are very popular, see the partial list of references [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. Typically these models contain a Z with mass M Z savagely coupled to …”
Section: Models With An Extra Zmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A big "thank you" goes to Andrzej Buras for pointing out errors in various equations in section 9 of the first version of this manuscript (see also [60]). The research of R. G. is supported by an STFC Postgraduate Studentship and F. G. acknowledges support by the Swiss National Foundation under contract SNF 200021-143781.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%