2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authentication of barley-finished beef using visible and near infrared spectroscopy (Vis-NIRS) and different discrimination approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis was supported by the improvement in the accuracy of discrimination of G0 from G0AL and AL when the latter two groups were considered as one group. This outcome agrees with [ 8 ], who reported that the removal of the blended grain-fed category from the analyses of barley- and corn-fed beef, increased the percentage of correctly classified subcutaneous fat samples. The fact that the CDA model using the L*, a*, b* data identified the a* value as the main discriminating variable indicates that there is little additional value in this approach beyond the univariate analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This hypothesis was supported by the improvement in the accuracy of discrimination of G0 from G0AL and AL when the latter two groups were considered as one group. This outcome agrees with [ 8 ], who reported that the removal of the blended grain-fed category from the analyses of barley- and corn-fed beef, increased the percentage of correctly classified subcutaneous fat samples. The fact that the CDA model using the L*, a*, b* data identified the a* value as the main discriminating variable indicates that there is little additional value in this approach beyond the univariate analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Prieto et al [ 7 ] concluded that the visible part of the visible–NIRS spectrum (350–750 nm) was unsuccessful in discriminating between dark and normal beef muscle, but no data were provided. More recently, Barragan et al [ 8 ] reported 70% and 66% correct classification of muscle from cattle finished on a barley- or corn-based ration, respectively, using the visible part of the visible–NIRS spectrum. Accordingly, our second objective was to determine the potential of both the colour parameters and the reflectance spectrum of muscle to discriminate between beef from bulls that grazed grass only or concentrates before slaughter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of applications, NIR spectrometers can be divided into laboratory spectrometers, portable spectrometers and online spectrometers. In the past ten years, different types of NIR spectrometers have developed rapidly, such as visible/shortwave near-infrared spectrometers (Vis/SW-NIR) ( Barragan et al, 2021 ), miniaturized and handheld near-infrared spectrometers ( Mcgrath et al, 2020 ), near-infrared hyperspectral imaging (NIR-HSI), which integrates sample spectra and images ( Khamsopha et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Principle Of Nir Spectroscopy and Chemometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revilla et al (2020) correctly classified 84% of dry-cured beef samples of a Protected Geographic Indication quality label and 100% of non-Protected Geographic Indication, using a benchtop NIR spectrometer and artificial neural network. Barragán et al (2021) correctly classified 75% to 100% of subcutaneous fat and intact meat samples from cattle fed barley or corn using a portable Vis-NIRS instrument and applying linear SVM. These authors confirmed the successful application of the SVM technique in studies with relatively small data sets while allowing an external validation.…”
Section: Near Infrared Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%