2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NAFLD: Time to apply quantitation in liver biopsies as endpoints in clinical trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results, irrespective of the modeling approach, offer further confirmation regarding the generalizability of the NASH CRN scale in that significantly high reliability was not achievable, either between or within pathologists. These findings are consistent with a crop of new studies which have disputed the generalizability of the original NASH scale establishment [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results, irrespective of the modeling approach, offer further confirmation regarding the generalizability of the NASH CRN scale in that significantly high reliability was not achievable, either between or within pathologists. These findings are consistent with a crop of new studies which have disputed the generalizability of the original NASH scale establishment [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For example, numerous studies have highlighted the high inter-and intra-rater reliability of the NASH CRN staging scale (e.g. carefully chosen representative tissue samples and scoring performed by experts with decades of experience as opposed to variable tissue quality interpreted by a generalist) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] . It is feasible that the described qualitative scoring system, which was designed for clinical prognostication, is not reproducible or reliable enough to rigorously gauge fibrosis regression in a drug trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this new analysis further supports that virtual trichrome staining is a viable intermediate diagnostic decision aid, there is clearly further room for improvement. Regardless, the application of the Bridge Category Model to the assessment of Virtual Staining technologies may serve as a guide for other biomedical researchers seeking to validate their technologies using best statistical practices 2,9 . For instance, the Bridge Category Model presents pathologist specific estimates of the tendency to up/downstage bridge categories, which provide useful information for finetuning staging / prognostication / drug effect technologies and understanding clinical decision making (as well as suggesting a potential new avenue for training and maintenance of certification).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, collagen proportionate area (CPA) as assessed by digital image analysis may offer a more granular assessment of fibrosis than routine histological analysis. Small changes detected by CPA might be missed when comparing fibrosis stages [ 114 , 115 ]. Furthermore, ML-based histological assessment is worth evaluation as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials.…”
Section: Dynamic Monitoring and Prognosis Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%