2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicenter, prospective, blinded, nonselection study evaluating the predictive value of an aneuploid diagnosis using a targeted next-generation sequencing–based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy assay and impact of biopsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
85
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21,22 To date, only two 'nonselection' studies to investigate the clinical predictive value of PGT-A have been published. 2,23 This involves performing PGT-A without using the information to select embryos for transfer, followed by unblinding PGT-A results once actual clinical outcomes have been determined. Similar studies involving the transfer of embryos classified as mosaic or segmental aneuploid are currently underway.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 To date, only two 'nonselection' studies to investigate the clinical predictive value of PGT-A have been published. 2,23 This involves performing PGT-A without using the information to select embryos for transfer, followed by unblinding PGT-A results once actual clinical outcomes have been determined. Similar studies involving the transfer of embryos classified as mosaic or segmental aneuploid are currently underway.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean age of the treated patients in this cohort (35.8 years) may contribute to high miscarriage rate in the present cohort (29.7%), together with ovarian insufficiency [34], which was diagnosed in many infertile patients in this cohort (table 1). Two prospective randomised clinical trials have demonstrated that preimplantation genetic testing of the chromosome complement (PGT-A) of the trophectoderm of blastocyst embryos has the potential to identify embryos with a higher implantation potential and to avoid miscarriages caused by aneuploidy [35,36]. These findings, however, have not been confirmed by all [37].…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it remains an ongoing discussion, mounting evidence suggests identification of a euploid embryo for transfer significantly increases implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates for patients with a range of indications, including advanced maternal age and recurrent miscarriage, as well as good-prognosis patients using single-embryo transfer (Rubio et al, 2019). Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using blastocyst biopsy and next-generation sequencing (NGS) has now clearly been shown to have high predictive potential for forecasting failure to deliver for preimplantation embryos diagnosed with aneuploidy (Tiegs et al, 2020). Removal of a single blastomere for PGT-A at the cleavage-stage may decrease the conceptus' implantation potential (Scott et al, 2013;Mastenbroek and Repping, 2014); however, the implications of blastocyst biopsy are far less substantial (Cimadomo et al, 2016;Tiegs et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using blastocyst biopsy and next-generation sequencing (NGS) has now clearly been shown to have high predictive potential for forecasting failure to deliver for preimplantation embryos diagnosed with aneuploidy (Tiegs et al, 2020). Removal of a single blastomere for PGT-A at the cleavage-stage may decrease the conceptus' implantation potential (Scott et al, 2013;Mastenbroek and Repping, 2014); however, the implications of blastocyst biopsy are far less substantial (Cimadomo et al, 2016;Tiegs et al, 2020). Regardless, this assessment may still be confounded by the prevalence of genetic mosaicism leading to false euploid diagnoses (Baart et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%